International Concrete Abstracts Portal

SP123 This volume is a collection of technical papers on the aspects of design of beam-column joints for seismic resistance. Nineteen papers are divided into the following groups. - Tests conducted on specimens designed using current codes but with the same general geometry and a specified loading history. (4 papers) - Design recommendations -- Japan. (1 paper) - Influence of joint geometry on strength and deformation characteristics. (8 papers) - Influence of bond on joint performance. (4 papers) - Joint in precast systems and with high-strength materials. (2 papers)

Cyclic loading tests of eight half-scale interior beam-column subassemblages using high-strength materials were carried out to investigate their seismic behavior under high joint shear stress vn ranging from 140 to 200 kg/cmý. Concretes with three nominal compressive strengths; 400, 600, and 800 kg/cmý was used. High-strength reinforcing bars with a yield strength of 4000 and 6000 kg/cmý were provided as beam longitudinal reinforcement. Reinforcing bars with a yield strength of 8700 kg/cmý were used for joint transverse reinforcement. To prevent premature shear failure in joints and significant slippage of beam bars through joints, four different types of joint detail were planned. They included high-strength bars for joint reinforcement, anchor plates attached to beam longitudinal bars in the joint, relocation of beam plastic hinges away from the joint, and joint reinforcement using steel plates. The beam-column joints using high-strength concrete of 600 kg/cmý or higher showed ductile behavior up to 5 percent story drift, even under conditions of high join-shear stress. No significant bar slippage or bond deterioration was observed, including the joints using high-strength beam main bars. The high-strength transverse reinforcement worked effectively as joint reinforcement, as indicated by considerably high strains measured in joint hoops. The relocation of beam plastic hinges away from the joint reduced damage of the beam-column joint. Based on the test results, guidelines for design of such reinforced concrete beam-column joints are presented.

A set of shear-resistant actions is presented to analyze reinforced concrete interior beam-column joints in weak beam-strong column ductile frames. The proposed analysis explains the results of experiments of beam-column joints with and without bond at beam bars and with various horizontal shear reinforcement. Local bond strength at beam bars affects horizontal hoop stress. Under or up to the limit of enough bond, larger local bond strength demands larger horizontal hoop stress. Over this limit, larger local bond strength demands smaller horizontal hoop stress. Joint shear reinforcement improves anchorage of beam bars because horizontal hoop stress guarantees bond stress outside diagonal strut. This results in smaller compressive stresses of joint concrete, preventing compressive shear failure.

As part of a United States/New Zealand/Japan/China collaborative research project, interior and exterior beam-column joint subassemblages with floor slabs of prototype two-way and one-way reinforced concrete building frames were designed for earthquake resistance using the current New Zealand concrete design code, NZS 3101:1982. Three full-scale subassemblages as designed were constructed and tested under quasi-static cyclic loading which simulated severe earthquake actions. The overall performance of each subassemblage during the tests was satisfactory in terms of strength and ductility. The joint core and column remained essentially undamaged while plastic hinges formed in the beams. The strong column-weak beam behaviour sought in the design, desirable in tall ductile frames designed for earthquake resistance, was therefore achieved. Although the joint cores of the subassemblages remained in the elastic range, joint core shear deformations contributed significantly to the interstorey drifts. Also, a significant proportion of the slab bars in tension contributed to the negative moment flexural strength of the beams. The performance of the one-way joint was superior to the performance of the two way joints.

Three reinforced concrete beam-column connections, each with a slab were tested under the U.S.-Japan-New Zealand-China cooperative research program on design of beam-column connections. Two of the specimens were subjected to both unidirectional and bidirectional cyclic loads. Results of the tests are described with the aid of story shear drift angle relations, story shear orbits, measured joint shear deformations, and plots of drift angle components. Various methods for calculating joint shear strength are evaluated in light of the test results. Test data are also used to determine slab effective widths for use in calculation of uncracked beam stiffness and beam flexural capacity.