ACI Global Home Middle East Region Portal Western Europe Region Portal
Email Address is required Invalid Email Address
In today’s market, it is imperative to be knowledgeable and have an edge over the competition. ACI members have it…they are engaged, informed, and stay up to date by taking advantage of benefits that ACI membership provides them.
Read more about membership
Learn More
Become an ACI Member
Topics In Concrete
Home > Frequently Asked Questions
In This Section
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit a Question
Search other resources on the ACI website for answers to technical questions
Q. With the advent and popularity of finite element analysis software, engineers can create sophisticated models of two-way slabs supported by columns. To comply with ACI 318, should a designer check punching shear stress with the simultaneous biaxial moments reported by such a model? A. The code equations were written at a time when structures were analyzed in independent directions. The approach of calculating shear stress independently has been proven to be conservative where frame lines are analyzed independently. Finite Element Modeling can provide a design that would be thinner than a traditional analysis. There is no rule of thumb that can identify when the design has become unconservative for this case. Some design engineers consider biaxial moments for two-way slabs and other elements such as corner columns when pushing the lower limits of the code. It would seem prudent that, if the designer is trying to get down to the half-inch, shear would be checked for the biaxial condition. References: ACI 318-19 Topics in Concrete: 318 Building Code; Design; Slab
Q. With the advent and popularity of finite element analysis software, engineers can create sophisticated models of two-way slabs supported by columns. To comply with ACI 318, should a designer check punching shear stress with the simultaneous biaxial moments reported by such a model?
A. The code equations were written at a time when structures were analyzed in independent directions. The approach of calculating shear stress independently has been proven to be conservative where frame lines are analyzed independently. Finite Element Modeling can provide a design that would be thinner than a traditional analysis. There is no rule of thumb that can identify when the design has become unconservative for this case. Some design engineers consider biaxial moments for two-way slabs and other elements such as corner columns when pushing the lower limits of the code. It would seem prudent that, if the designer is trying to get down to the half-inch, shear would be checked for the biaxial condition.
References: ACI 318-19
Topics in Concrete: 318 Building Code; Design; Slab