Progressive Collapse-Resisting Mechanisms of Planar Prestressed Concrete Frame

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Progressive Collapse-Resisting Mechanisms of Planar Prestressed Concrete Frame

Author(s): Kai Qian, Xi-De Zhang, Feng Fu, and Bing Li

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 116

Issue: 4

Appears on pages(s): 77-90

Keywords: bonded; catenary action; compressive arch action; mechanism; post-tensioning tendon; prestressed concrete; progressive collapse

DOI: 10.14359/51715567

Date: 7/1/2019

Abstract:
This paper presents the behavior of six tests of planar prestressed concrete frames under the loss of a middle column. The six tests consist of two non-prestressed reinforced concrete (RC) specimens and four prestressed concrete (PC) specimens with bonded post-tensioning tendons (BPT). The structural response of the specimens with different flexural reinforcement ratio, span-depth ratio, and effective prestress level has been reported. In addition, the impact of parabolic BPT on the behavior of RC frames to resist progressive collapse is also evaluated. Experimental results indicated that the BPT cannot only increase the initial stiffness and yielding load of the RC counterparts, but also increase the ultimate load capacity in the catenary action stage. Moreover, it will impact the load-resisting mechanisms and the failure modes. Contrary to the commonly accepted sequential mobilization of compressive arch action and catenary action to resist progressive collapse of RC frames, no effective compressive arch action is developed in PC frames to mitigate progressive collapse risk. Based on experimental observations, it is found that higher effective prestress in BPT results in enhanced initial stiffness and yielding load but less deformation capacity and ultimate load capacity. It is also found that higher non-prestressed flexural tensile reinforcement ratio could improve the behavior of PC specimens to resist progressive collapse.

Related References:

1. ASCE/SEI 7, “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures,” Structural Engineering Institute-American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2010, 424 pp.

2. Su, Y. P.; Tian, Y.; and Song, X. S., “Progressive Collapse Resistance of Axially-Restrained Frame Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 106, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2009, pp. 600-607.

3. Orton, S.; Jirsa, J. O.; and Bayrak, O., “Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer for Continuing in Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings Vulnerable to Collapse,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 106, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2009, pp. 608-616.

4. Yu, J., and Tan, K. H., “Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Progressive Collapse Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Beam Column Sub-Assemblages,” Engineering Structures, V. 55, 2013, pp. 90-106. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.040

5. Sasani, M., and Kropelnicki, J., “Progressive Collapse Analysis of an RC Structure,” Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, V. 17, No.  4, 2008, pp. 757-771. doi: 10.1002/tal.375

6. Lew, H. S.; Bao, Y. H.; Pujol, S.; and Sozen, M. A., “Experimental Study of Reinforced Concrete Assemblies under Column Removal Scenario,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 4, July-Aug. 2014, pp. 881-892. doi: 10.14359/51686739

7. Qian, K., and Li, B., “Slab Effects on the Response of Reinforced Concrete Substructures after Loss of Corner Column,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 109, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2012, pp. 845-855.

8. Xuan Dat, P., and Tan, K. H., “Experimental Study of Beam-Slab Substructures Subjected to a Penultimate-Internal Column Loss,” Engineering Structures, V. 55, 2013, pp. 2-15. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.026

9. Ren, P. Q.; Li, Y.; Lu, X. Z.; Guan, H.; and Zhou, Y. L., “Experimental Investigation of Progressive Collapse Resistance of One-Way Reinforced Concrete Beam-Slab Substructures under a Middle-Column-Removal Scenario,” Engineering Structures, V. 118, July 2016, pp. 28-40. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.051

10. Qian, K.; Li, B.; and Zhang, Z., “Influence of Multicolumn Removal on the Behavior of RC Floors,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 142, No. 5, 2016, p. 04016006 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001461

11. Peng, Z. H.; Orton, S. L.; Liu, J. R.; and Tian, Y., “Experimental Study of Dynamic Progressive Collapse in Flat-Plate Buildings Subjected to Exterior Column Removal,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 143, No. 9, 2017, p. 04017125 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001865

12. Qian, K.; Liu, Y.; Yang, T.; and Li, B., “Progressive Collapse Resistance of Post-Tensioned Concrete Beam-Column Sub-assemblages with Un-Bonded Post-Tensioning Strands,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 144, No. 1, 2018, p. 04017182 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001940

13. Kim, J., and Choi, H., “Monotonic Loading Tests of RC Beam-Column Subassemblage Strengthened to Prevent Progressive Collapse,” International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, V. 9, No. 4, 2015, pp. 401-413. doi: 10.1007/s40069-015-0119-2

14. GSA, “Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Projects,” U.S. General Service Administration, Washington, DC, 2010.

15. UFC 4-023-03, “Design of Building to Resist Progressive Collapse,” U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC, 2005.

16. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 520 pp.

17. Izzuddin, B. A.; Vlassis, A. G.; Elghazouli, A. Y.; and Nethercot, D. A., “Progressive Collapse of Multi-Storey Buildings due to Sudden Column Loss—Part I: Simplified Assessment Framework,” Engineering Structures, V. 30, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1308-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.011

18. Tsai, M. H., and Lin, B. H., “Investigation of Progressive Collapse Resistance and Inelastic Response for an Earthquake-Resistant RC Building Subjected to Column Failure,” Engineering Structures, V. 30, No. 12, 2008, pp. 3619-3628. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.05.031

19. Qian, K., and Li, B., “Research Advances in Design of Structures to Resist Progressive Collapse,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, V. 29, No. 5, 2015, p. B4014007 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000698

20. Yi, W.; He, Q.; Xiao, Y.; and Kunnath, S. K., “Experimental Study on Progressive Collapse-Resistant Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 4, July-Aug. 2008, pp. 433-439.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer