International Concrete Abstracts Portal

As a result of the limited data available when the current ACI 440.11-22 development length equation was developed, certain parameters were disregarded. Additionally, the equation was based on bars that are no longer in use today, and significant advancements have been made in FRP material properties and production methods since its calibration. Conflicting research findings have led to differing perspectives on its reliability, with some suggesting it yields overly conservative results, while others argue it may overestimate bond strength. To address this concern, an experimental study was conducted to assess the bond stresses between GFRP bars and conventional concrete in under-reinforced concrete beams. The beams were reinforced using a single M16 (No.5) Glass/Vinyl-ester FRP sand-coated bar. Three different lap splice lengths (i.e., 40-, 60-, and 80-times bar diameter) were selected based on available literature. The results indicate that the bond is primarily governed by surface friction, with negligible impact from relative slippage. The lap-spliced specimens exhibited slippage failure but exceeded design moments based on ACI provisions, indicating efficient performance. Stiffness remained comparable to that of the un-spliced beam, suggesting intact bond capacity despite some slippage. Average bond stress calculations closely aligned with ACI maximum bond stress values. Overall, the study offers valuable insights into GFRP bar behavior and bond capacity.

Recently codified language in ACI CODE-440.11-22 provides an equation for concrete shear capacity and imposes a lower bound on this calculation. An experimental study consisting of 39 flexural members without shear reinforcement and tested to failure in shear was used to evaluate the current code provisions, including, most specifically, the lower bound. Comparison of experimental and analytical shear capacities demonstrates that the current code provisions are conservative. More lightly reinforced specimens have a higher variability in experimental-to-nominal concrete shear strength than more heavily reinforced specimens, and this variability appears to be dominated by the depth between the elastic cracked section neutral axis and the depth of the tensile reinforcement, which is the area where aggregate interlock occurs. Based on a comparative reliability study, the lower bound, kcr = 0.16 (5kcr = 0.8), in the code, causes more lightly reinforced specimens (kcr < 0.16) to have lower factors of safety against shear failure than more heavily reinforced specimens (kcr > 0.16). Rather than imposing a lower bound of 5kcr on the current shear strength equation, it would be more prudent to resolve the overprediction of the equation for all specimens.

Corrosion of reinforcement steel is a major issue for many structural concrete components, because it leads to strength reduction and may significantly reduce the service life. For this reason, fiber-reinforced polymer rebars (FRP rebars) have been developed, as they represent a viable alternative that may replace reinforcing steel for structures that are particularly susceptible to corrosion issues. However, structural design philosophies for these new materials are still in development and further research is needed to implement FRP rebars properly and safely in design codes but also to ensure that design calculations properly predict the actual behavior and performance of FRP reinforced structures.

This study was conducted to evaluate the strength and structural deformation behavior of flexural beams that were designed according to Eurocode 2 and, for comparison, according to different design methods pro-posed for FRP reinforced structures. With regard to the development of a uniform design concept for alternative reinforcement materials existing in Germany/Europe, different bending design concepts includ-ing the serviceability limit state were evaluated. In addition, the theoretically calculated and predicted strength/deformation were compared to the experimentally obtained measurements. A total of 15 flexu-ral beams, with ans overall length of 4.5 m (177 in.), a width of 200 mm (7.8 in.), and a height of 400 mm (15.8 in.), were cast; three of these beams (designed according to Eurocode 2) featured traditional steel rein-forcement, to serve as control group. The remaining 12 flexural beams were evenly allocated to capture the two alternative reinforcement materials, while generating three different reinforcement distribution patterns with comparable reinforcement ratios (equivalent cross-sectional areas). Thus, a total of six subgroups –three with GFRP and three with BFRP – each with two specimens, were analized. To test all beam in pure bending and to eliminate the influence from shear forces, two equally increasing loads were applied at the (longitudinal) third-points of the beams. Both deflections and loads were measured at several points to evaluate the structural performance of the FRP reinforced structural members.

The results showed that the deflection of the glass fiber reinforced bars at the design load capacity measured twice as much as the deflection of the control group. Almost three times as much deflection (at the same load) was observed for the concrete beams reinforced with basalt fiber rebars. In addition, it was observed that the concrete beams with glass and basalt fiber reinforcement bars showed a nearly elastic-elastic behavior up to the point of failure, whereas the steel-reinforced concrete beams showed an elastic-plastic behavior. However, the deformational behavior differed between the various beam types. While the prevailing equations properly captured the post-cracking performance of traditionally reinforced concrete beams, they do not adequately predict the deflections of FRP reinforced concrete beams. From the measurements and analyses, it was concluded that the serviceability limit state (SST) is more critical than the ultimate limit state (LTS) for the design of concrete flexural beams reinforced with FRP rebars.

The issues related to deformability, strength and ductility of concrete elements reinforced with FRP (Fiber Reinforced Polymer) bars are critically analyzed and discussed in this paper. The analysis is conducted from an experimental point of view by means of bending tests on concrete beams reinforced with Carbon FRP (CFRP) bars with different amounts of reinforcement, and by an analytical approach aiming to evaluate the deflection and cracking phenomenon (number and width of cracks). The experimental results are compared with the analytical predictions and with predictions developed on the basis of the available codes (ACI, EC2, JSCE). The analysis of the results obtained confirms the most relevant issues of the mechanical behavior of FRP bar-reinforced beams, still worthy of research efforts; some technological and construction solutions that can provide significant improvements are also addressed.

Masonry structures are very sensitive to out-of-plane mechanisms under horizontal actions. A common traditional technique to avoid or mitigate the activation of these mechanisms is represented by injected anchors made of steel bars aimed to improve the connections between orthogonal masonry walls or between floors and masonry walls. The bars are usually embedded in the masonry by means of cement-based grout in holes realized inside the elements to be connected. Recently, an increased interest has developed in the scientific community about the use of Fibre Reinforced Plastic (FRP) bars as alternative to the steel ones for injected anchors, mainly because of their high tensile strength and inertia to corrosion, which can give them high durability, in addition to the use of high-performance grouts. The paper reports the results of experimental pull-out tests realized by the Authors on several types of FRP bars used as injected anchors in small masonry specimens made of yellow tuff blocks. A hydraulic lime and pozzolana-based grout is used to fix the bars in holes realized in the masonry specimens along an embedded length of 250 mm. The set-up is realized in order to apply pure tension to the bars and shear stresses along the bar-grout and the grout-masonry interfaces. The results are analysed in terms of maximum pull-out forces, failure modes and force-displacement relations in order to evidence the global performance of each tested system, especially in relation with the diameter and the surface treatment of the bars. Some comparisons with literature formulation for predicting the pull-out force are developed too.