International Concrete Abstracts Portal

A systematic literature review was conducted on pure tension strengthening of concrete structures using fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP), specifically for larger FRP tie applications. This work yielded a dataset of 1,627 direct tension tests, and highlighted the limitation of existing studies on studying thick and long FRP ties, which are typical in real construction scenarios. To overcome this shortcoming, 51 single lap shear tests were conducted on thicker and longer FRP ties, with the dimensions being 0.5 to 6 mm [0.02 to 0.24 in.] thickness, and 300 to 1,524 mm [12 to 60 in.] long. The critical parameters under consideration were concrete compressive strength, FRP thickness, and bond length. The findings demonstrate that thicker and therefore stiffer FRP ties have higher debond force capacity, while longer ties exhibit greater post-elastic deformation capacity but do not affect the debond force capacity. Concrete had a limited effect on either debond force or deformation capacity. A strength model is proposed for FRP systems under axial pure tension, which aligns well with both the published and tested results. This paper focuses on the development of design guidelines and codes to predict the debond strain for EB-FRP systems incorporating thicker and longer FRP ties, aiming to enhance the applicability of FRP to real-world construction scenarios.

The American Concrete Institute (ACI) 440.1R-15 Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Bars linearly reduces the bar stress and thereby pull-out capacity of FRP bars to zero from an embedment length at 20 bar diameters (db) or less. Most experimental research and data examine the development length of various FRP bars at longer, more traditional, embedment lengths. A database was created from select available data in literature to compare to empirical standards. This investigation examines the bond performance of short embedded FRP bars into concrete considering a pull-out failure mode to expand the understanding of short embedded FRP bars into concrete. Based upon the database collected, for the glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars, the current 440.1R appear quite conservative. For the basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) rebar database collected, the current ACI 440.1R-15 provisions appear unconservative for a statistically significant number of the specimen test results within the database. In the case of the carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) database, which is quite limited, the data appears to develop considerably less bond strength than the current 440.1R provisions might suggest which requires deeper investigation for the case of short embedment length bonded CFRP bars.

This study evaluates the bond performance of concrete epoxy bonds using an image segmentation-based image processing technique. The Concrete Epoxy Interface (CEI) plays a crucial role in the structural performance of FRP-repaired concrete as it transfers stresses from the concrete to the epoxy. By employing the image segmentation technique, the performance of the CEI is assessed through the ratio of Interfacial Failure (IF) to other failure types, namely cohesive failure in Epoxy (CE) and Cohesive cracks in Concrete (CC). The effects of sustained loading duration on CEI bond performance are quantitatively analyzed using 21 single-lap shear (SLS) specimens and 28 notched 3-Point Bending (3PB) specimens. The findings highlight vital conclusions: CE is the least failure mode in SLS and 3PB specimens. In contrast, CC is the predominant failure mode, indicating the susceptibility of the concrete substrate in FRP-repaired concrete. Moreover, IF generally increases with longer sustained loading durations in 3PB specimens but decreases with increased loading duration in SLS specimens. The study also demonstrates the effectiveness of the image segmentation approach in evaluating CEI performance in 3PB specimens, where color distinguishes epoxy, FRP, and concrete substrate.

As a result of the limited data available when the current ACI 440.11-22 development length equation was developed, certain parameters were disregarded. Additionally, the equation was based on bars that are no longer in use today, and significant advancements have been made in FRP material properties and production methods since its calibration. Conflicting research findings have led to differing perspectives on its reliability, with some suggesting it yields overly conservative results, while others argue it may overestimate bond strength. To address this concern, an experimental study was conducted to assess the bond stresses between GFRP bars and conventional concrete in under-reinforced concrete beams. The beams were reinforced using a single M16 (No.5) Glass/Vinyl-ester FRP sand-coated bar. Three different lap splice lengths (i.e., 40-, 60-, and 80-times bar diameter) were selected based on available literature. The results indicate that the bond is primarily governed by surface friction, with negligible impact from relative slippage. The lap-spliced specimens exhibited slippage failure but exceeded design moments based on ACI provisions, indicating efficient performance. Stiffness remained comparable to that of the un-spliced beam, suggesting intact bond capacity despite some slippage. Average bond stress calculations closely aligned with ACI maximum bond stress values. Overall, the study offers valuable insights into GFRP bar behavior and bond capacity.

Recently codified language in ACI CODE-440.11-22 provides an equation for concrete shear capacity and imposes a lower bound on this calculation. An experimental study consisting of 39 flexural members without shear reinforcement and tested to failure in shear was used to evaluate the current code provisions, including, most specifically, the lower bound. Comparison of experimental and analytical shear capacities demonstrates that the current code provisions are conservative. More lightly reinforced specimens have a higher variability in experimental-to-nominal concrete shear strength than more heavily reinforced specimens, and this variability appears to be dominated by the depth between the elastic cracked section neutral axis and the depth of the tensile reinforcement, which is the area where aggregate interlock occurs. Based on a comparative reliability study, the lower bound, kcr = 0.16 (5kcr = 0.8), in the code, causes more lightly reinforced specimens (kcr < 0.16) to have lower factors of safety against shear failure than more heavily reinforced specimens (kcr > 0.16). Rather than imposing a lower bound of 5kcr on the current shear strength equation, it would be more prudent to resolve the overprediction of the equation for all specimens.