Bond Behavior of 0.6 in. (15.2 mm) Prestressing Strand in Belitic Calcium Sulfoaluminate (BCSA) Cement Concrete

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Bond Behavior of 0.6 in. (15.2 mm) Prestressing Strand in Belitic Calcium Sulfoaluminate (BCSA) Cement Concrete

Author(s): Troy M. Bowser, Cameron D. Murray, and Royce W. Floyd

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 117

Issue: 1

Appears on pages(s): 43-52

Keywords: belitic calcium sulfoaluminate (BCSA) cement; bond; development length; prestressed concrete; rapid setting concrete; transfer length

DOI: 10.14359/51720196

Date: 1/1/2020

Abstract:
An investigation into the bonding capabilities of 0.6 in. (15.2 mm) prestressing strands cast in belitic calcium sulfoaluminate (BCSA) cement concrete beams was performed to determine if the current ACI development length requirements for prestressing strands are applicable to BCSA cement. Portland cement and BCSA cement concrete beam specimens of one mixture design were cast, with varying concrete ages at prestress release. Transfer lengths were determined for 28 days after casting using surface strain measurements and strand end slip. Prestress losses were measured using vibrating wire strain gauges and were compared to the AASHTO and PCI/Zia et al. methods. Flexural tests were performed to determine if adequate flexural bond performance was achieved with the specified development length. The BCSA prestressed concrete beams performed at least as well as the portland cement control specimens with regards to transfer length, development length, and flexural performance even when prestress release was performed at 2 hours after casting. Measured prestress losses for BCSA cement concrete beams were significantly less than predicted using the currently available methods. More work is needed to extend these findings to other mixture designs and water-cement ratios (w/c).

Related References:

1. Floyd, R., and Ramseyer, C., “Behavior of Precast, Prestressed Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement Concrete Beams,” PCI Convention and National Bridge Conference at the Precast Show, Nashville, TN, 2016.

2. Murray, C.; Floyd, R.; and Ramseyer, C., “Using Belitic Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement for Precast, Prestressed Concrete Beams,” PCI Journal, V. 64, No. 2, 2019, pp. 55-67.

3. Sharp, J.; Lawrence, C.; and Yang, R., “Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cements—Low-Energy Cements,” Advances in Cement Research, V. 11, No. 1, 1999, pp. 3-13. doi: 10.1680/adcr.1999.11.1.3

4. Thomas, R.; Maguire, M.; Sorensen, A.; and Quezada, I., “Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement: Benefits and Applications,” Concrete International, V. 40, No. 4, Apr. 2018, pp. 65-69.

5. Jen, G.; Stompinis, N.; and Jones, R., “Chloride Ingress in a Belite-­Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement Matrix,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 98, 2017, pp. 130-135. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.013

6. Dachtar, J., “Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement as a Binder for Structural Concrete,” PhD dissertation, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2004.

7. Moffatt, E., and Thomas, M., “Durability of Rapid-Strength Concrete Produced with Ettringite-Based Binders,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 115, No. 1, Jan. 2018, pp. 105-115. doi: 10.14359/51701006

8. Chen, I.; Hargis, C.; and Juenger, M., “Understanding Expansion in Calcium Sulfoaluminate-Belite Cements,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 42, No. 1, 2012, pp. 51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.07.010

9. Juenger, M. C. G.; Winnefeld, F.; Provis, J. L.; and Ideker, J. H., “Advances in Alternative Cementitious Binders,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 41, No. 12, 2011, pp. 1232-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.012

10. Quillin, K., “Performance of Belite-Sulfoaluminate Cements,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 31, No. 9, 2001, pp. 1341-1349. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00543-9

11. Liao, Y.; Wei, X.; and Li, G., “Early Hydration of Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement through Electrical Resistivity Measurement and Microstructure Investigations,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 25, No. 4, 2011, pp. 1572-1579. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.042

12. Péra, J., and Ambroise, J., “New Applications of Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 4, 2004, pp. 671-676. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.10.019

13. Paglia, C.; Wombacher, F.; and Bohni, H., “Hydration, Strength, and Microstructural Development of High Early-Strength C4A3S Activated Burnt Oil Shale-Based Cement System,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 98, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2001, pp. 379-385

14. Winnefeld, F., and Lothenbach, B., “Hydration of Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cements—Experimental Findings and Thermodynamic Modelling,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 40, No. 8, 2010, pp. 1239-1247. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.014

15. Logan, D. R., “Acceptance Criteria for Bond Quality of Strand for Pretensioned Prestressed Concrete Applications,” PCI Journal, V. 42, No. 2, 1997, pp. 52-90. doi: 10.15554/pcij.03011997.52.90

16. Rose, D. R., and Russell, B. W., “Investigation of Standardized Tests to Measure the Bond Performance of Prestressing Strand,” PCI Journal, V. 42, No. 4, 1997, pp. 56-80. doi: 10.15554/pcij.07011997.56.80

17. Peterman, R. J.; Ramirez, J. A.; and Olek, J., “Design of Semi-Lightweight Bridge Girders: Development Length Considerations,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, V. 1696, No. 1, 2000, pp. 41-47. doi: 10.3141/1696-06

18. Larson, K. H.; Peterman, R. J.; and Esmaeily, A., “Bond Characteristics of Self-Consolidating Concrete for Prestressed Bridge Girders,” PCI Journal, V. 52, No. 4, 2007, pp. 44-57. doi: 10.15554/pcij.07012007.44.57

19. Ramirez, J., and Russell, B., “Transfer, Development and Splice Length for Strand/Reinforcement in High-Strength Concrete,” National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2008.

20. Staton, B.; Do, N.; Ruiz, E.; and Hale, W., “Transfer Lengths of Prestressed Beams Cast with Self-Consolidation Concrete,” PCI Journal, V. 54, No. 2, 2009, pp. 64-83. doi: 10.15554/pcij.03012009.64.83

21. Ward, D. B.; Floyd, R. W.; and Hale, W. M., “Bond of 0.5 in. Diameter Strands Cast in Lightweight SCC,” Proceedings PCI-FHWA National Bridge Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2009.

22. Floyd, R. W.; Ruiz, E. D.; Do, N. H.; Staton, B. W.; and Hale, W. M., “Development Lengths of High-Strength Self-Consolidating Concrete Beams,” PCI Journal, V. 56, No. 1, 2011, pp. 36-53. doi: 10.15554/pcij.01012011.36.53

23. ASTM A1081/A1081M-15, “Standard Test Method for Evaluating Bond of Seven-Wire Steel Prestressing Strand,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 5 pp.

24. Polydorou, T., “Determination of Acceptance Criteria for Prestressing Strand in Pre-Tensioned Applications,” doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 2014.

25. Riding, K. A.; Peterman, R. J.; and Polydorou, T., “Establishment of Minimum Acceptance Criterion for Strand Bond as Measured by ASTM A1081,” PCI Journal, V. 61, No. 3, 2016, pp. 86-103.

26. Bodapati, N. N.; Peterman, R. J.; Beck, B. T.; Wu, C.-H. J.; and Riding, K. A., “Comparison of Initial and Long-Term Transfer Lengths Determined from Internal and External Concrete Strain Measurements,” Precast Concrete Institute Convention/National Bridge Conference, 2017.

27. Russell, B. W., and Burns, N., “Measured Transfer Lengths of 0.5 and 0.6 in. Strands in Pretensioned Concrete,” PCI Journal, V. 41, No. 5, 1996, pp. 44-65. doi: 10.15554/pcij.09011996.44.65

28. Thatcher, D.; Heffington, J.; Kolozs, R.; Sylva III, G.; Breen, J.; and Burns, N., “Structural Lightweight Concrete Prestressed Girders and Panels,” The University of Texas at Austin, Center for Transportation Research, Austin, TX, 2002.

29. Federation International de la Precontrainte (FIP), “Test for the Determination of Tendon Transmission Length Under Static Conditions,” FIP, Wexham Springs, UK, 1982.

30. Balazs, G., “Transfer Length of Prestressing Strand as a Function of Draw-In and Initial Prestress,” PCI Journal, V. 38, No. 2, 1993, pp. 86-93. doi: 10.15554/pcij.03011993.86.93

31. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.

32. AASHTO, “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” eighth edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2017.

33. Dang, C. N.; Floyd, R. W.; Prinz, G. S.; and Micah Hale, W., “Determination of Bond Stress Distribution Coefficient by Maximum Likelihood Method,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 142, No. 5, 2016, p. 04016003 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001460

34. Martí-Vargas, J. R.; Arbelaez, C. A.; Serna-Ros, P.; and Castro-Bugallo, C., “Reliability of Transfer Length Estimation from Strand End Slip,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 104, No. 4, July-Aug. 2007, pp. 487-494.

35. Martí-Vargas, J. R.; Serna, P.; Navarro-Gregori, J.; and Bonet, J. L., “Effects of Concrete Composition on Transmission Length of Prestressing Strands,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 27, No. 1, 2012, pp. 350-356. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.038

36. Sfikas, I. P., and Trezos, K. G., “Effect of Composition Variations on Bond Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete Specimens,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 41, 2013, pp. 252-262. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.094

37. Zia, P.; Preston, H. K.; Scott, N. L.; and Workman, E. B., “Estimating Prestress Losses,” Concrete International, V. 1, No. 6, June, 1979, pp. 32-38.

38. Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, “PCI Design Handbook: Precast and Prestressed Concrete,” Chicago, IL, 2010.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer