In-Plane Crack Rotation Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Panels

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: In-Plane Crack Rotation Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Panels

Author(s): Chen-hui Qian, Xiao-bing Song, and Si-jia Chen

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume: 120

Issue: 1

Appears on pages(s): 333-344

Keywords: crack rotation; modified Voigt-Reuss method; reinforced concrete panels; shear behavior at crack surface

DOI: 10.14359/51737281

Date: 1/1/2023

Abstract:
Crack direction and rotation are closely related to the mechanical behavior of concrete in a reinforced concrete panel under membrane forces. This paper focuses on situations where obvious crack rotation is likely to occur. Two basic factors causing crack rotation are analyzed by Mohr’s stress circle. One is unequal reinforcement ratio and the other is nonproportional loading. For further description of crack rotation behavior, a theoretical model based on equilibrium, compatibility, and constitutive relation is established. The shear behavior of a single concrete crack is incorporated into this model by a modified Voigt-Reuss method to describe smeared cracking in reinforced concrete panels. Two series of reinforcing bar-reinforced test panels with unequal reinforcement ratio and one series of steel plate-reinforced test panels with nonproportional loading are selected for verification. The results show that the presented model provides better prediction for the entire load-deformation response and crack rotation angles in these panels than in some prevailing models.

Related References:

1. Ahmad, R., “Biaxial Principal Stress Interaction Diagram for Reinforced Concrete Membrane Elements,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 3, May 2019, pp. 119-133.

2. Belarbi, A., and Hsu, T. T., “Constitutive Laws of Concrete in Tension and Reinforcing Bars Stiffened by Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 91, No. 4, July-Aug. 1994, pp. 465-474.

3. Bhide, S. B., and Collins, M. P., “Influence of Axial Tension on the Shear Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Members,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 86, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 1989, pp. 570-581.

4. Broujerdian, V., and Kazemi, M. T., “Smeared Rotating Crack Model for Reinforced Concrete Membrane Elements,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 107, No. 4, July-Aug. 2010, pp. 411-418.

5. Hsu, T. T. C., and Mo, Y.-L., Unified Theory of Concrete Structures, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2010.

6. Hsu, T. T. C., and Zhu, R. R. H., “Softened Membrane Model for Reinforced Concrete Elements in Shear,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 99, No. 4, July-Aug. 2002, pp. 460-469.

7. Mansour, M., and Hsu, T. T. C., “Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Elements under Cyclic Shear. II: Theoretical Model,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 131, No. 1, 2005, pp. 54-65. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:1(54)

8. Mansour, M.; Lee, J.-Y.; and Hsu, T. T., “Cyclic Stress-Strain Curves of Concrete and Steel Bars in Membrane Elements,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 127, No. 12, 2001, pp. 1402-1411. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:12(1402)

9. Calvi, P. M.; Bentz, E. C.; and Collins, M. P., “Model for Assessment of Cracked Reinforced Concrete Membrane Elements Subjected to Shear and Axial Loads,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 115, No. 2, Mar. 2018, pp. 501-509.

10. Hsu, T. C. H., and Zhang, L.-X., “Nonlinear Analysis of Membrane Elements by Fixed-Angle Softened-Truss Model,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 94, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 1997, pp. 483-492.

11. Vecchio, F. J., “Disturbed Stress Field Model for Reinforced Concrete: Formulation,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 126, No. 9, 2000, pp. 1070-1077. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:9(1070)

12. Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P., “The Modified Compression-Field Theory for Reinforced Concrete Elements Subjected to Shear,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 83, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1986, pp. 219-231.

13. Pang, X.-B. D., and Hsu, T. T. C., “Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Membrane Elements in Shear,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 92, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1995, pp. 665-679.

14. Zararis, P. D., “Failure Mechanisms in R/C Plates Carrying In-Plane Force,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 114, No. 3, 1988, pp. 553-574. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:3(553)

15. Walraven J., and Reinhardt H., “Concrete Mechanics. Part A: Theory and Experiments on the Mechanical Behavior of Cracks in Plain and Reinforced Concrete Subjected to Shear Loading,” NASA Sti/recon Technical Report N, 1981.

16. Ozaki, M.; Akita, S.; Osuga, H.; Nakayama, T.; and Adachi, N., “Study on Steel Plate Reinforced Concrete Panels Subjected to Cyclic In-Plane Shear,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, V. 228, No. 1-3, 2004, pp. 225-244. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2003.06.010

17. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary (ACI 318R-08),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2008, 473 pp.

18. Yamaguchi, E., and Chen, W.-F., “Cracking Model for Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Materials,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, V. 116, No. 6, 1990, pp. 1242-1260. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:6(1242)

19. Rostasy, F., and Alda, W., “Rißbreitenbeschränkung bei zentrischem Zwang von Stäben aus Stahlbeton und Stahlleichtbeton,” Beton- und Stahlbetonbau, V. 72, No. 6, 1977, pp. 149-156. doi: 10.1002/best.197700260

20. Beeby, A. W., “The Prediction of Crack Widths in Hardened Concrete,” ACI 318Reference, V. 57A, No. 1, 1979, pp. 9-17.

21. Efsen, A., “Tensile Cracks in Reinforced Concrete,” Ingenieur 71e Jaargang, No. 41, 1959.

22. Ferry-Borges, J., “Cracking and Deformability of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” IABSE, 1966, 26 pp.

23. Monterio, “General theory of cracking,” CEB-Bulletin d’Information, V. 89, 1973, p. 89

24. Rehm, G., and Martin, H., “Zur Frage der Rissbegrenzung im Stahlbetonbau,” Beton- und Stahlbetonbau, V. 63, 1968, pp. 175-182.

25. Chen, W.-F., and Han, D.-J., Plasticity for Structural Engineers, J. Ross Publishing, Inc, Chicago, IL, 2007.

26. Huang, C.-J.; Qian, C.-H.; and Song, X.-B., “Explicit Nonlinear and Plastic Analysis Model of Steel–Concrete–Steel Sandwich Panels,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, V. 168, 2019, p. 105872.

27. Huang, C.-J.; Wu, X.-A.; Chen, S.-J.; and Song, X.-B., “Behaviors of Steel-Plate and Concrete in Steel-Concrete-Steel Panels Subjected to Biaxial Tension-Compression,” Structures, V. 30, 2021, pp. 217-228. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.032

28. Prasad, M.; Huang, C.-J.; Song, X.-B.; Chen, S.-J.; and Qian, C.-H., “Concrete Behavior in Steel-Concrete-Steel Panels Subjected to Biaxial Tension Compression,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, V. 167, 2020, p. 105947. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.105947


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Structural Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer