Quantifying Influence of Off-Spec Fly Ash Characteristics on Concrete Performance

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

  


Title: Quantifying Influence of Off-Spec Fly Ash Characteristics on Concrete Performance

Author(s): Gokul Dev Vasudevan and David Trejo

Publication: Materials Journal

Volume: 120

Issue: 3

Appears on pages(s): 31-44

Keywords: carbon footprint; constituent materials of concrete; degree of reactivity; fresh and hardened characteristics of concrete; greenhouse gas emissions; off-spec fly ash

DOI: 10.14359/51738707

Date: 5/1/2023

Abstract:
Fly ashes that do not meet the ASTM C618 specifications areconsidered “off-spec” and are not used as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). In this research, four off-spec fly ashes (OFAs) were sourced from different parts of the United States and the characteristics of these OFA concretes were measured to compare their performance with that of the mixtures containing 0% OFA. The first objective of this study is to assess the influence of OFA reactivity and replacement levels on concrete characteristics. The second objective is to assess the influence of constituent material characteristics such as shape and size of coarse aggregate, fineness modulus of fine aggregate, and cementitious content of the concrete mixture on the fresh and hardened characteristics of concretes containing OFAs. Results indicate that at sufficient degrees of reactivity and replacement levels, OFAs can provide characteristics comparable to that of conventional ordinary portlandcement (OPC) concrete while improving the consistency of theconcrete. Findings from sensitivity analysis reveal that the degree of reactivity (DoR) of the OFA has a high influence on the hardened characteristics of concrete. Finally, the life cycle assessment of concrete mixtures containing OFAs indicate that greenhouse gas emissions can be reduced up to 45% when compared to conventional mixtures.

Related References:

1. Fulton, A. A., and Marshall, W. T., “The Use of Fly Ash and Similar Materials in Concrete,” Proceedings - Institution of Civil Engineers, V. 5, No. 6, 1956, pp. 714-730. doi: 10.1680/iicep.1956.11525

2. Marsh, B. K., and Day, R. L., “Pozzolanic and Cementitious Reactions of Fly Ash in Blended Cement Pastes,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 18, No. 2, 1988, pp. 301-310. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(88)90014-2

3. Weng, J. K.; Langan, B. W.; and Ward, M. A., “Pozzolanic Reaction in Portland Cement, Silica Fume, and Fly Ash Mixtures,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 24, No. 5, 1997, pp. 754-760. doi: 10.1139/l97-025

4. Juenger, M.; Provis, J. L.; Elsen, J.; Matthes, W.; Hooton, R. D.; Duchesne, J.; Courard, L.; He, H.; Michel, F.; Snellings, R.; and Belie, N. D., “Supplementary Cementitious Materials for Concrete: Characterization Needs,” MRS Online Proceedings Library, V. 1488, 2012, pp. 8-22. doi: 10.1557/opl.2012.1536

5. Adams, T. H., “Fly Ash Use in Concrete Increases Slightly as Overall Coal Ash Recycling Rate Declines,” American Coal Ash Association, Farmington Hills, MI, https://acaa-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/coal-combustion-products-use/Coal-Ash-Production-and-Use.pdf. (last accessed Mar. 29, 2023)

6. Kozhukhova, M.; Wittenberg, R.; and Sobolev, K., “Green Cementitious Systems Based on Off-spec Fly Ash,” International RILEM Workshop on Concrete Durability and Service Life Planning (ConcreteLife), 2020, pp. 104-108.

7. Du, J.; Liu, Z.; Christodoulatos, C.; Conway, M.; Bao, Y.; and Meng, W., “Utilization of Off-Specification Fly Ash in Preparing Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC): Mixture Design, Characterization, and Life-Cycle Assessment,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, V. 180, 2022, p. 106136. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106136

8. Wang, Y.; Burris, L.; Hooton, R. D.; Shearer, C. R.; and Suraneni, P., “Effects of Unconventional Fly Ashes on Cementitious Paste Properties,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 125, 2022, p. 104291. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104291

9. ASTM C618/C618-78, “Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in as a Mineral Admixture In Portland Cement Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1978, 4 pp.

10. Glosser, D.; Choudhary, A.; Isgor, O. B.; and Weiss, W. J., “Investigation of Reactivity of Fly Ash and its Effect on Mixture Properties,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 116, No. 4, July 2019, pp. 193-200. doi: 10.14359/51716722

11. Suraneni, P.; Azad, V. J.; Isgor, O. B.; and Weiss, W. J., “Deicing Salts and Durability of Concrete Pavements and Joints,” Concrete International, V. 38, No. 4, Apr. 2016, pp. 48-54.

12. Azad, V. J., and Isgor, O. B., “A Thermodynamic Perspective on Admixed Chloride Limits of Concrete Produced With SCMs,” Chloride Thresholds and Limits for New Construction, SP-308, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2016, pp. 1-18.

13. Papadakis, V. G., “Effect of Fly Ash on Portland Cement Systems: Part I. Low-Calcium Fly Ash,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 29, No. 11, 1999, pp. 1727-1736. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00153-2

14. Papadakis, V. G., “Effect of Fly Ash on Portland Cement Systems: Part II. High-Calcium Fly Ash,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 30, No. 10, 2000, pp. 1647-1654. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00388-4

15. Mehta, P. K., and Monteiro, P. J., Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 2014, 684 pp.

16. Kosmatka, S. H.; Kerkhoff, B.; and Panarese, W. C., Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 2002, 459 pp.

17. Trejo, D.; Vaddey, N. P.; Vasudevan, G. D.; Amirkhanian, A.; and Isgor, B., “Constructability and Durability of Concrete Pavements,” Technical Report, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, OR, 2022, 217 pp.

18. Chang, T. P.; Lin, S. H.; Lin, H. C.; and Lin, P. R., “Effects of Various Fineness Moduli of Fine Aggregate on Engineering Properties of High‐Performance Concrete,” Zhongguo Gongcheng Xuekan, V. 24, No. 3, 2001, pp. 289-300. doi: 10.1080/02533839.2001.9670627

19. Stock, A. F.; Hannantt, D. J.; and Williams, R. I. T., “The Effect of Aggregate Concentration Upon the Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 31, No. 109, 1979, pp. 225-234. doi: 10.1680/macr.1979.31.109.225

20. Chu, S. H., “Effect of Paste Volume on Fresh and Hardened Properties of Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 218, 2019, pp. 284-294. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.131

21. Glosser, D.; Suraneni, P.; Isgor, O. B.; and Weiss, W. J., “Using Glass Content to Determine the Reactivity of Fly Ash for Thermodynamic Calculations,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 115, 2021, p. 103849. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103849

22. Bharadwaj, K.; Choudary, A.; Chopperla, K. S. T.; Glosser, D.; Vasudevan, G. D.; Isgor, O. B.; Ideker, J. H.; Trejo, D.; and Weiss, W. J., “Performance-Based Mixture Proportioning of Concrete Incorporating Off-Spec Fly Ash: Mixture Proportioning Method Development and Validation,” Technical Report, Electrical Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, Oct. 2020, 78 pp., https://www.epri.com/research/programs/113123/results/3002018795. (last accessed Mar. 29, 2023)

23. ASTM C143/C143M-20, “Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, 8 pp.

24. ASTM C231/C231M-17a, “Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, 8 pp.

25. ASTM C192/C192M-14, “Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014.

26. ASTM C39/C39M-20, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, 8 pp.

27. ASTM C1876/C1876-19, “Standard Test Method for Bulk Electrical Resistivity or Bulk Conductivity of Concrete,” West Conshohocken, PA, 2019, 7 pp.

28. Head, M. K., and Buenfeld, N. R., “Confocal Imaging of Porosity in Hardened Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 36, No. 5, 2006, pp. 896-911. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.06.006

29. Chindaprasirt, P., and Rukzon, S., “Strength, Porosity and Corrosion Resistance of Ternary Blend Portland Cement, Rice Husk Ash and Fly Ash Mortar,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 22, No. 8, 2008, pp. 1601-1606. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.06.010

30. AASHTO TP 135-20, “Standard Method of Test for Determining the Total Pore Volume in Hardened Concrete Using Vacuum Saturation,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC, 2020, 8 pp.

31. Bu, Y.; Spragg, R.; and Weiss, W. J., “Comparison of the Pore Volume in Concrete as Determined Using ASTM C642 and Vacuum Saturation,” Advances in Civil Engineering Materials, V. 3, No. 1, 2014, pp. 308-315. doi: 10.1520/ACEM20130090

32. Circular Ecology, “Concrete Embodied Carbon Footprint Calculator,” https://circularecology.com/concrete-embodied-carbon-footprint-calculator.html. (last accessed Mar. 29, 2023)

33. Plackett, R. L., and Burman, J. P., “The Design of Optimum Multifactorial Experiments,” Biometrika, V. 33, No. 4, 1946, pp. 305-325. doi: 10.2307/2332195

34. Minitab, Inc., MINITAB Statistical Software, Minitab Release 13, 2000.

35. Ding, Z., and Li, Z., “High-Early-Strength Magnesium Phosphate Cement with Fly Ash,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 102, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2005, pp. 375-381

36. Li, Y., and Chen, B., “Factors that Affect the Properties of Magnesium Phosphate Cement,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 47, 2013, pp. 977-983. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.103

37. Gardner, L. J.; Bernal, S. A.; Walling, S. A.; Corkhill, C. L.; Provis, J. L.; and Hyatt, N. C., “Characterization of Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cements Blended with Fly Ash and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 74, 2015, pp. 78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.01.015

38. Ding, Z.; Dong, B.; Xing, F.; Han, N.; and Li, Z., “Cementing Mechanism of Potassium Phosphate-Based Magnesium Phosphate Cement,” Ceramics International, V. 38, No. 8, 2012, pp. 6281-6288. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.04.083

39. Kilinç, K.; Ariöz, Ö.; and Uyan, M., “Effects of Sulfates on Strength of Portland Cement Mortars,” The Fifteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, 2005, 5 pp.

40. Mulwa, M. O.; Karanja, T. O. J.; and Wachira, M. J., Effect of Sulphate Ions in Mixing Water on Cement Mortar Performance. IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry (IOSR-JAC), V 9, 2016, pp. 11-15.

41. Wang, X. Y., “Effect of Fly Ash on Properties Evolution of Cement-Based Materials,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 69, 2014, pp. 32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.029

42. Rubert, S.; Angulski da Luz, C.; Varela, M. V. F.; Pereira Filho, J. I.; and Hooton, R. D., “Hydration Mechanisms of Supersulfated Cement,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, V. 134, No. 2, 2018, pp. 971-980. doi: 10.1007/s10973-018-7243-6

43. Hewlett, P., and Liska, M., eds., Lea’s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2019, 1087 pp.


ALSO AVAILABLE IN:

Electronic Materials Journal



  

Edit Module Settings to define Page Content Reviewer