ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL CONCRETE ABSTRACTS PORTAL

  • The International Concrete Abstracts Portal is an ACI led collaboration with leading technical organizations from within the international concrete industry and offers the most comprehensive collection of published concrete abstracts.

International Concrete Abstracts Portal

  


Title: Capacity Estimations for Three-Pile Caps with Size and Reinforcement Variations (Prepublished)

Author(s): Srinivas Mogili, Shyh-Jiann Hwang, Kuang-Yen Liu, Toshikatsu Ichinose, Lucas Laughery, and Kazuhiko Kasai

Publication: Structural Journal

Volume:

Issue:

Appears on pages(s):

Keywords: pile caps; punching; reinforced concrete; scaled testing; shear strength; size effect; softened strut-and-tie model; two-way shear

DOI: 10.14359/51743292

Date: 10/7/2024

Abstract:
Past investigations showed that the one-way shear strength of reinforced concrete members exhibits “size effect” – a phenomenon whereby shear strength does not increase in direct proportion to member size. However, it is unclear if the reduction in the two-way shear strength of reinforced concrete members due to size effect applies in the same magnitude as one-way shear strength. To investigate the size effect in two-way shear, twelve three-pile caps were tested in three size groups: small, medium, and large. Specimens were doubly scaled from small to medium and medium to large groups, with all other key nondimensional structural parameters such as span-to-depth ratio, reinforcement ratio, etc. kept constant. The test results supported the existence of size effect in deep pile cap members, although the observed rate of unit shear strength reduction with depth was less severe than that predicted by size effect provisions in American and Japanese design codes. Capacity estimations made using sectional and strut-and-tie approaches prescribed by design codes, as well as the proposed analytical procedure using the softened strut-and-tie model are presented. The proposed method produced reasonably accurate estimations at all size ranges capturing the effect of reinforcement more efficiently resulting in an overall mean test-to-calculated capacity ratio of 1.15 with a low coefficient of variation of 11%.