Title:
Torsion and Shear Flow of Hollow Reinforced Concrete Beams Retrofitted with Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Sheets
Author(s):
Yail J. Kim and Abdulaziz Alqurashi
Publication:
Structural Journal
Volume:
122
Issue:
4
Appears on pages(s):
35-49
Keywords:
carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP); hollow sections; rehabilitation; strengthening; torsion.
DOI:
10.14359/51743305
Date:
7/1/2025
Abstract:
This paper presents the torsional behavior of hollow reinforced
concrete beams strengthened with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer
(CFRP) U-wraps. Test parameters involve variable wall thickness
in the section and the width and spacing of the externally
bonded CFRP sheets. An experimental program is conducted with
27 beams (three unstrengthened and 24 strengthened) to examine
their capacities, shear flows, and force distributions when incorporating
a ratio of 0.27 to 0.46 between the areas of the hollow
and gross cross sections. The stiffness and capacity of the test
beams are dominated by the wall thickness, and the effectiveness
of CFRP strengthening becomes pronounced as the void of the
beams decreases. The presence of CFRP redistributes internal
shear forces in the cross section, which is facilitated by narrowing
the spacing of the U-wraps. The effective zone of CFRP retrofit
is positioned near the outer boundary of the strengthened section.
Regarding crack control, multiple discrete U-wraps with narrow
spacings outperform wide U-wraps with enlarged spacings. While
the location of a shear-flow path is dependent upon the wall thickness,
the width of the U-wraps controls the effective shear-flow
area of the beams. The size of the void is related to the stress levels
of internal reinforcing components, including yield characteristics.
Transverse stirrups are the principal load-bearing element for
the unstrengthened beams; however, the reliance of the stirrups is
reduced for the strengthened beams because the U-wraps take over
portions of the torsional resistance. Through a machine learning
approach combined with stochastic simulations, design recommendations are proposed.
Related References:
1. Altun, F.; Haktanir, T.; and Ari, K., “Experimental Investigation of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Box Beams under Bending,” Materials and Structures, V. 39, No. 4, 2007, pp. 491-499. doi: 10.1617/s11527-006-9095-y
2. Abbass, A. A.; Abid, S. R.; Arnaot, F. H.; Al-Ameri, R. A.; and Ozakca, M., “Flexural Response of Hollow High Strength Concrete Beams Considering Different Size Reductions,” Structures, V. 23, 2020, pp. 69-86. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2019.10.001
3. Do, T. V.; Pham, T. M.; Gehl, A.; Hao, H.; and Nguyen, T. P., “Impact Responses of Precast Hollow Reinforced Concrete Beams with Prestress Tendons Using High-Fidelity Physics-Based Simulations,” Engineering Failure Analysis, V. 131, 2022, p. 105850. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105850
4. Hassan, R. F.; Jaber, M. H.; Al-Salim, N. H.; and Hussein, H. H., “Experimental Research on Torsional Strength of Synthetic/Steel Fiber-
Reinforced Hollow Concrete Beam,” Engineering Structures, V. 220, 2020, p. 110948. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110948
5. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.
6. Delatte, N., Failure, Distress and Repair of Concrete Structures, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2009.
7. Lantsoght, E. O. L., Load Testing of Bridges, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2019.
8. Samb, N.; Chaallal, O.; and El-Saikaly, G., “Multilayer versus Monolayer Externally Bonded CFRP Sheets for Shear Strengthening of Concrete T-Beams,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 25, No. 4, 2021, p. 04021025. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001139
9. Siddika, A.; Al Mamum, M. A.; Ferdous, W.; and Alyousef, R., “Performances, Challenges and Opportunities in Strengthening Reinforced Concrete Structures by Using FRPs: A State-of-the-Art Review,” Engineering Failure Analysis, V. 111, 2020, p. 104480. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104480
10. ACI Committee 440, “Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures (ACI 440.2R-17),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2017, 112 pp.
11. Abdoli, M., and Mostofinejad, D., “Torsional Behavior of FRP-Strengthened Reinforced Concrete Members Considering Various Wrapping Configurations: Theoretical Analysis and Modeling,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 401, 2023, p. 132636. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132636
12. Ameli, M.; Ronagh, H. R.; and Dux, P. F., “Behavior of FRP Strengthened Reinforced Concrete Beams under Torsion,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 11, No. 2, 2007, pp. 192-200. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:2(192)
13. fib, “Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement for RC Structures,” fib Bulletin 14, International Federation for Structural Concrete, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2001.
14. TRB, “Recommended Guide Specifications for the Design of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Repair and Strengthening of Concrete Bridge Elements,” NCHRP Report 655, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2010.
15. Hii, A. K. Y., and Al-Mahaidi, R., “Torsional Capacity of CFRP Strengthened Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 11, No. 1, 2007, pp. 71-80. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:1(71)
16. Colalillo, M. A., and Sheikh, S. A., “Behavior of Shear-Critical Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer: Experimentation,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 111, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2014, pp. 1373-1384. doi: 10.14359/51687035
17. Alabdulhady, M. Y., and Sneed, L. H., “Torsional Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Externally Bonded Composites: A State of the Art Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 205, 2019, pp. 148-163. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.163
18. CNR-DT 200 R1/2013, “Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Existing Structures,” National Research Council, Rome, Italy, 2013.
19. Chalioris, C. E., “Analytical Model for the Torsional Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beams Retrofitted with FRP Materials,” Engineering Structures, V. 29, No. 12, 2007, pp. 3263-3276. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.09.009
20. Hsu, T. T. C., “Shear Flow Zone in Torsion of Reinforced Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 116, No. 11, 1990, pp. 3206-3226. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:11(3206)
21. Hadhood, A.; Gouda, M. G.; Agamy, M. H.; Mohamed, H. M.; and Sherif, A., “Torsion in Concrete Beams Reinforced with GFRP Spirals,” Engineering Structures, V. 206, 2020, p. 110174. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110174
22. Hsu, T. T. C., “Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Rectangular Members,” Torsion of Structural Concrete, SP-18, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1968, pp. 261-306.
23. Nawy, E. G., Reinforced Concrete: A Fundamental Approach, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2009.
24. Kim, Y. J., and Alqurashi, A., “Effectiveness of Carbon Fiber-
Reinforced Polymer Sheets for Torsional-Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 121, No. 5, Sept. 2023, pp. 203-215.
25. MathWorks, MATLAB, the Language of Technical Computing, MathWorks, Natick, MA, 2023.
26. Okeil, A.; El-Tawil, S.; and Shahawy, M., “Flexural Reliability of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Girders Strengthened With Carbon Fiber-
Reinforced Polymer Laminates,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 7, No. 5, 2002, pp. 290-299. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2002)7:5(290)
27. Nowak, A. S., and Collins, K. R., Reliability of Structures, second edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2013.
28. Atadero, R. A., and Karbhari, V. M., “Calibration of Resistance Factors for Reliability-Based Design of Externally-Bonded FRP Composites,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 39, No. 4, 2008, pp. 665-679. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.06.004
29. Mirza, S. A.; Kikuchi, D. K.; and MacGregor, J. G., “Flexural Strength Reduction Factor for Bonded Prestressed Concrete Beams,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 77, No. 4, July-Aug. 1980, pp. 237-246.
30. Sanchez-Heres, L.; Ringsberg, J. W.; and Johnson, E., “Influence of Mechanical and Probabilistic Models on the Reliability Estimates of Fibre-Reinforced Cross-Ply Laminates,” Structural Safety, V. 51, 2014, pp. 35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.06.001
31. Biscaia, H. C.; Chastre, C.; Cruz, D.; and Viegas, A., “Prediction of the Interfacial Performance of CFRP Laminates and Old Timber Bonded Joints with Different Strengthening Techniques,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 108, 2017, pp. 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.097
32. Zakaria, M.; Ueda, T.; Wu, Z.; and Meng, L., “Experimental Investigation on Shear Cracking Behavior in Reinforced Concrete Beams with Shear Reinforcement,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, V. 7, No. 1, 2009, pp. 79-96. doi: 10.3151/jact.7.79
33. Majeed, A. A.; Allawi, A. A.; Chai, K. H.; and Badaruzzam, H. W. W., “Behavior of CFRP Strengthened RC Multicell Box Girders under Torsion,” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, V. 61, No. 3, 2017, pp. 397-406. doi: 10.12989/sem.2017.61.3.397
34. Ma, S.; Bunnori, N. M.; and Choong, K. K., “Torsional Behaviour of RC Box Beams Strengthened by CFRP under Combined Shear and Torsion,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Structures and Buildings, V. 175, No. 12, 2022, pp. 950-964. doi: 10.1680/jstbu.20.00072