Title:
Influence of Nanosilica on Physical Salt Attack Resistance of Portland Cement Mortar
Author(s):
Nader Ghafoori, Iani Batilov, and Meysam Najimi
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
117
Issue:
4
Appears on pages(s):
67-80
Keywords:
microsilica; nanosilica; physical salt attack; sodium sulfate; sulfate attack
DOI:
10.14359/51725779
Date:
7/1/2020
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of
colloidal nanosilica (nS) as a nanomaterial and pozzolanic admixture to mitigate the deteriorative effects of sodium sulfate-based physical salt attack (PSA) on portland cement mortars. Mortar mixtures of an ASTM C150 Type II (<8% C3A) or a Type V (<5% C3A) portland cement were prepared with 0, 3, and 6% cement replacements with either nS or microsilica (mS). Test samples were subjected to 3 years of exposure under a constant or cyclic PSA-conducive environment. The PSA results were supported with additional water absorption, rapid sulfate ion permeability (RSPT), and porosimetry testing. The Type V cement mortars containing nS exhibited the most observable scaling and flaking under both conditions of PSA exposure. The addition and increase in cement replacement with nS had a clear detrimental effect to PSA resistance for both cement types and both types of PSA exposure. Results indicated nS reduces permeability and diffusion in mixtures of either cement type which, for PSA, the denser and more refined pore network proved conducive to higher damaging tensile stresses and distress. The larger the measured volume of permeable pore space through absorption, the less susceptible the mortars were to PSA, which is counterproductive to conventional good practice of designing high-durability concrete via reducing permeability and sorption, and increasing a mixture’s watertightness.
Related References:
1. Kosmatka, S. H., and Wilson, M. L., Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures, 16th edition, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 2016.
2. Haynes, H., and Bassuoni, M. T., “Physical Salt Attack on Concrete,” Concrete International, V. 33, No. 11, Nov. 2011, pp. 38-42.
3. Mehta, P. K., and Monteiro, P. J., Concrete Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, third edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006.
4. Hime, W. G.; Martinek, R. A.; Backus, L. A.; and Marusin, S. L., “Salt Hydration Distress,” Concrete International, V. 23, No. 10, Oct. 2001, pp. 43-50.
5. Haynes, H.; O’Neill, R.; and Mehta, K. P., “Concrete Deterioration from Physical Attack by Salts,” Concrete International, V. 18, No. 1, Jan. 1996, pp. 63-68.
6. ACI Committee 201, “Guide to Durable Concrete (ACI 201.2R-16),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2016, 84 pp.
7. Tsui, N.; Flatt, R. J.; and Scherer, G. W., “Crystallization Damage by Sodium Sulfate,” Journal of Cultural Heritage, V. 4, No. 2, 2003, pp. 109-115. doi: 10.1016/S1296-2074(03)00022-0
8. Hewlett, P. C., and Massazza, F., Lea’s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, 2003, pp. 471-635.
9. Skalny, J.; Marchand, J.; and Odler, I., Sulfate Attack On Concrete, Spon Press, London and New York, 2002.
10. Mehta, P. K., “Sulfate Attack on Concrete: Separating Myths from Reality,” Concrete International, V. 22, No. 8, Aug. 2000, pp. 57-61.
11. Doehne, E., “Kinetics of Sodium Sulfate Efflorescence as Observed by Humidity Cycling with ESEM,” Proceedings of the Heritage, Weathering & Conservation Conference, Madrid, Spain, June 21-24, 2006.
12. Binda, L., and Baronio, G., “Mechanisms of Masonry Decay Due to Salt Crystallization,” Durability of Building Materials, V. 4, No. 3, 1987, pp. 227-240.
13. Thaulow, N., and Sahu, S., “Mechanism of Concrete Deterioration Due to Salt Crystallization,” Materials Characterization, V. 53, No. 2-4, 2004, pp. 123-127. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2004.08.013
14. Rodriguez-Navarro, C., and Doehne, E., “Salt Weathering: Influence of Evaporation Rate, Supersaturation and Crystallization Pattern,” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, V. 24, No. 3, 1999, pp. 191-209. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199903)24:33.0.CO;2-G
15. Flatt, R. J., “Salt Damage in Porous Materials: How High Supersaturations Are Generated,” Journal of Crystal Growth, V. 242, No. 3-4, 2002, pp. 435-454. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0248(02)01429-X
16. Scherer, G. W., “Stress from Crystallization of Salt,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 34, No. 9, 2004, pp. 1613-1624. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.034
17. ACI Committee 234, “Guide for the Use of Silica Fume in Concrete (ACI 234R-06),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2006, 63 pp.
18. Bentur, A., and Cohen, M. D., “Effect of Condensed Silica Fume on the Microstructure of the Interfacial Zone in Portland Cement Mortars,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 70, No. 10, 1987, pp. 738-743. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04873.x
19. Cohen, M. D., and Bentur, A., “Durability of Portland Cement-Silica Fume Pastes in Magnesium Sulfate and Sodium Sulfate Solutions,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 85, No. 3, May-June 1988, pp. 148-157.
20. Sellevold, E. J., and Nilsen, T., “Condensed Silica Fume in Concrete: A World Review,” Supplementary Cementing Materials for Concrete, V. M. Malhotra, ed., CANMET, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1987, pp. 167-243.
21. Tobón, J. I.; Payá, J.; and Restrepo, O. J., “Study of Durability of Portland Cement Mortars Blended with Silica Nanoparticles,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 80, No. 4, 2015, pp. 92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.074
22. Singh, L. P.; Karade, S. R.; Bhattacharyya, S. K.; Yousuf, M. M.; and Ahalawat, S., “Beneficial Role of Nanosilica in Cement Based Materials – A Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 47, No. 10, 2013, pp. 1069-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.052
23. Nehdi, M. L.; Suleiman, R.; and Soliman, M., “Investigation of Concrete Exposed to Dual Sulfate Attack,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 64, 2014, pp. 42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.002
24. Aye, T., and Oguchi, C. T., “Resistance of Plain and Blended Cement Mortars Exposed to Severe Sulfate Attacks,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 25, No. 6, 2011, pp. 2988-2996. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.106
25. ASTM C1240-03, “Standard Specification for Silica Fume Used in Cementitious Mixtures,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003, 6 pp.
26. ASTM C128-15, “Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, 6 pp.
27. ASTM C33-03, “Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003, 11 pp.
28. ASTM C109/C109M-02, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2002, 6 pp.
29. ASTM C1012-04, “Standard Test Method for Length Change of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars Exposed to a Sulfate Solution,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004, 9 pp.
30. ASTM C305-99, “Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1999, 3 pp.
31. Haynes, H.; O’Neill, R.; and Mehta, K. P., “Concrete Deterioration from Physical Attack by Salts,” Concrete International, V. 18, No. 1, Jan. 1996, pp. 63-69.
32. ASTM C642-97, “Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1997, 3 pp.
33. ASTM C1202-97, “Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 1997, 8 pp.
34. CCAA, “Technical Note: Sulfate-Resisting Concrete,” Cement Concrete & Aggregates Australia, Mascot, NSW, Australia, 2011.
35. Tumidajski, P. J., and Turc, I., “A Rapid Test for Sulfate Ingress Into Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 25, No. 5, 1995, pp. 924-928. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00084-P
36. Zhutovsky, S., and Hooton, R. D., “Experimental Study on Physical Sulfate Salt Attack,” Materials and Structures, V. 50, No. 1, 2017, pp. 1-10. doi: 10.1617/s11527-016-0936-z
37. Mehta, P. K., and Monteiro, P. J., Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, fourth edition, McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 2014.
38. Bassuoni, M. T., and Rahman, M. M., “Response of Concrete to Accelerated Physical Salt Attack Exposure,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 79, 2016, pp. 395-408. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.006
39. Stanish, K. D.; Hooton, R. D.; and Thomas, M. D. A., “Testing the Chloride Penetration Resistance of Concrete: A Literature Review,” Toronto, ON, Canada, 1997.
40. Winter, N. B., Understanding Cement, WHD Microanalysis Consultants Ltd., Rendlesham, Woodridge, UK, 2012.
41. ASTM C150-02, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2002, 7 pp.