Title:
Suitability of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers for Masonry Plastering
Author(s):
Joseph J. Assaad and Marianne Saba
Publication:
Materials Journal
Volume:
117
Issue:
6
Appears on pages(s):
269-279
Keywords:
geopolymers; masonry cements; metakaolin; plasters; rheology; strength
DOI:
10.14359/51725991
Date:
11/1/2020
Abstract:
The development and use of geopolymers (GP) considerably increased in the construction industry. This paper assesses the suitability of metakaolin-based GP mortars for masonry plastering works, including their comparison to masonry cement (MC) mortars and compliance to relevant EN 413-1 and ASTM C91 specifications. Three classes of GP mortars prepared with different metakaolin-to-limestone ratios are tested; the sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate activators contained air-entraining molecules to secure approximately 10% ±2% air content. Test results showed that GP mortars exhibited excellent water retention and increased rheological properties, which was related to higher viscosity of alkaline solution that increases stickiness and overall cohesiveness.
For given limestone concentration, the mechanical properties of GP mortars including the pulloff bond strength and sorptivity were remarkably better than MC mixtures. Almost 90% of ultimate compressive strength was achieved after 7 days for GP mortars cured at ambient temperature, while this varied from 55 to 80% for
MC mixtures cured in moist conditions. This can be particularly advantageous in masonry applications to speed up construction operations while, at the same time, eliminate the hassle of moist curing normally required with cement-based plasters.
Related References:
1. Mobili, A.; Belli, A.; Telesca, A.; Marroccoli, M.; and Tittarelli, F., “Calcium Sulfoaluminate and Geopolymeric Binders as Alternatives to OPC,” Durability and Sustainability of Concrete Structures, SP-326, V. Falikman, R. Realfonzo, L. Coppola, P. Hàjek, and P. Riva, eds., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2018, pp. 28.1-28.10.
2. Firdous, R.; Stephan, D.; and Djobo, J. N. Y., “Natural Pozzolan Based Geopolymers: A Review on Mechanical, Microstructural and Durability Characteristics,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 190, 2018, pp. 1251-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.191
3. Rakhimova, N. R., and Rakhimov, R. Z., “Reaction Products, Structure and Properties of Alkali-Activated Metakaolin Cements Incorporated with Supplementary Materials – A Review,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, V. 8, No. 1, 2019, pp. 1522-1531. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.07.006
4. Assaad, J., and Issa, C., “Use of Locked-Cycle Protocol to Assess Cement Fineness and Properties in Laboratory-Grinding Mills,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 113, No. 4, July-Aug. 2016, pp. 429-438. doi: 10.14359/51688930
5. Assaad, J., and Issa, C., “Effect of Clinker Grinding Aids on Flow of Cement-Based Materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 63, 2014, pp. 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.04.006
6. Zhang, M.; Guo, H.; El-Korchi, T.; Zhang, G.; and Tao, M., “Experimental Feasibility Study of Geopolymer as the Next-Generation Soil Stabilizer,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 47, 2013, pp. 1468-1478. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.017
7. Lemougna, P. N.; MacKenzie, K. J. D.; and Melo, U. C., “Synthesis and Thermal Properties of Inorganic polymers (Geopolymers) for Structural and Refractory Applications from Volcanic Ash,” Ceramics International, V. 37, No. 8, 2011, pp. 3011-3018. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.05.002
8. Ducman, V., and Korat, L., “Characterization of Geopolymer Fly-Ash Based Foams Obtained with the Addition of Al Powder or H2O2 as Foaming Agents,” Materials Characterization, V. 113, 2016, pp. 207-213. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.01.019
9. Assaad, J. J.; Chakar, E.; and Zehil, G. P., “Testing and Modeling the Behavior of Sandwich Lightweight Panels against Wind and Seismic Loads,” Engineering Structures, V. 175, 2018, pp. 457-466. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.041
10. Ma, C. K.; Awang, A. Z.; and Omar, W., “Structural and Material Performance of Geopolymer Concrete: A Review,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 186, 2018, pp. 90-102. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.111
11. Tamburini, S.; Natali, M.; Garbin, E.; Panizza, M.; Favaro, M.; and Valluzzi, M. R., “Geopolymer Matrix for Fibre Reinforced Composites Aimed at Strengthening Masonry Structures,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 141, 2017, pp. 542-552. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.017
12. Laskar, A. I., and Bhattacharjee, R., “Rheology of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 108, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2011, pp. 536-542. doi: 10.14359/51683263
13. Güllü, H.; Cevik, A.; Al-Ezzi, K. M. A.; and Gülsan, M. E., “On the Rheology of Using Geopolymer for Grouting: A Comparative Study with Cement-Based Grout included Fly Ash and Cold Bonded Fly Ash,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 196, 2019, pp. 594-610. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.140
14. Favier, A.; Hot, J.; Habert, G.; Roussel, N.; and de Lacaillerie, J. B. E., “Flow Properties of MK-Based Geopolymer Pastes. A Comparative Study with Standard Portland Cement Pastes,” Soft Materials, V. 10, No. 8, 2014, pp. 1134-1141. doi: 10.1039/c3sm51889b
15. Assaad, J., and Daou, Y., “Cementitious Grouts with Adapted Rheological Properties for Injection by Vacuum Techniques,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 59, 2014, pp. 43-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.01.021
16. Palomo, A.; Banfill, P. F. G.; Jimenez, A. F.; and Swift, D. S., “Properties of Alkali-Activated Fly Ashes Determined from Rheological Measurements,” Advances in Cement Research, V. 17, No. 4, 2015, pp. 143-151. doi: 10.1680/adcr.2005.17.4.143
17. Palacios, M.; Banfill, P. F. G.; and Puertas, F., “Rheology and Setting of Alkali-Activated Slag Pastes and Mortars: Effect of Organic Admixture,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 105, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2008, pp. 140-148.
18. Mustafa Al Bakri, A. M.; Kamarudin, H.; Bnhussain, M.; Rafiza, A. R.; and Zarina, Y., “Effect of Na2SiO3/NaOH Ratios and NaOH Molarities on Compressive Strength of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 109, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 2012, pp. 503-508.
19. Chen, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; and Feng, J., “Preparation and Properties of Alkali Activated Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer,” Materials (Basel), V. 9, No. 767, 2016, pp. 1-12. doi: 10.3390/ma9090767
20. De Silva, P.; Sagoe-Crenstil, K.; and Sirivivatnanon, V., “Kinetics of Geopolymerization: Role of Al2O3 and SiO2,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 37, No. 4, 2007, pp. 512-518. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.01.003
21. Wang, D.; Shi, C.; Farzadnia, N.; Shi, Z.; and Jia, H., “A Review on Effects of Limestone Powder on the Properties of Concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 192, 2018, pp. 153-166. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.119
22. Alonso, S., and Palomo, A., “Alkaline Activation of Metakaolin and Calcium Hydroxide Mixtures: Influence of Temperature, Activator Concentration and Solids Ratio,” Materials Letters, V. 47, No. 1-2, 2001, pp. 55-62. doi: 10.1016/S0167-577X(00)00212-3
23. Boonjaeng, S.; Chindaprasirt, P.; and Pimraksa, K., “Lime-Calcined Clay Materials with Alkaline Activation: Phase Development and Reaction Transition Zone,” Applied Clay Science, V. 95, 2014, pp. 357-364. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2014.05.002
24. Qian, J., and Song, M., “Study on Influence of Limestone Powder on the Fresh and Hardened Properties of Early Age Metakaolin Based Geopolymer,” Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Calcined Clays for Sustainable Concrete, 2015, pp. 235-259.
25. Cwirzen, A.; Provis, J. L.; Penttala, V.; and Habermehl-Cwirzen, K., “The Effect of Limestone on Sodium Hydroxide-Activated Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 66, 2014, pp. 53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.022
26. Hesselbarth, D.; Moser, T.; and Sturzenegger, J., “Geopolymers Cured at Ambient Temperatures,” 10th ACI/RILEM International Conference on Cementitious Materials and Alternative Binders for Sustainable Concrete, SP-320, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2017, pp. 44.1-44.14.
27. Rovnanik, P., “Effect of Curing Temperature on the Development of Hard Structure of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 24, No. 7, 2010, pp. 1176-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.023
28. Kuenzel, C.; Vandeperre, L.; Donatello, S.; Boccaccini, A. R.; and Cheeseman, C. R., “Ambient Temperature Drying Shrinkage and Cracking in Metakaolin-Based Geopolymers,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, V. 95, No. 10, 2012, pp. 3270-3277. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05380.x
29. Shekhovtsova, J.; Kovtun, M.; and Kearslev, E. P., “Temperature Rise and Initial Shrinkage of Alkali-Activated Fly Ash Cement Pastes,” Advances in Cement Research, V. 28, No. 1, 2015, pp. 3-12. doi: 10.1680/adcr.14.00079
30. ACI Committee 525, “Guide to Portland Cement-Based Plaster (ACI 524R-16),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2016, 40 pp.
31. ASTM C270-19ae1, “Standard Specification for Mortar for Unit Masonry,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019.
32. Lawrence, S. J.; Sugo, H. O.; and Page, A. W., “Masonry Bond Strength and the Effects of Supplementary Cementitious Materials,” Engineers Australia, V. 876, 2005, pp. 1-7.
33. Khayat, K. H., and Assaad, J., “Use of Thixotropy-Enhancing Agent to Reduce Formwork Pressure Exerted by Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 105, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2008, pp. 88-96. doi: 10.14359/19211
34. Silva, R. V.; de Brito, J.; and Dhir, R. K., “Performance of Cementitious Renderings and Masonry Mortars Containing Recycled Aggregates from Construction and Demolition Wastes,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 105, 2016, pp. 400-415. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.171
35. Assaad, J. J., “Development of Polymer-Modified Cement for Adhesive and Repair Applications,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 163, 2018, pp. 139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.103
36. Valluzzi, M. R., “On the Vulnerability of Historical Masonry Structures: Analysis and Mitigation,” Materials and Structures, V. 40, No. 7, 2007, pp. 723-743. doi: 10.1617/s11527-006-9188-7
37. Vegas, I.; Azkarate, I.; Juarrero, A.; and Frias, M., “Design and Performance of Masonry Mortars Made with Recycled Concrete Aggregates,” Materiales de Construcción, V. 59, 2009, pp. 5-18. doi: 10.3989/mc.2009.44207
38. Thamboo, J. A.; Dhanasekar, M.; and Yan, C., “Flexural and Shear Bond Characteristics of Thin Layer Polymer Cement Mortared Concrete Masonry,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 46, 2013, pp. 104-113. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.002
39. Issa, C., and Assaad, J., “Stability and Bond Properties of Polymer-Modified Self-Consolidating Concrete for Repair Applications,” Materials and Structures, V. 50, No. 28, 2017, p. 28 doi: 10.1617/s11527-016-0921-6
40. EN 413-1, “Masonry Cement – Part 1: Composition, Specifications, and Conformity Criteria,” Comite Europeen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
41. ASTM C91/C91M-18, “Standard Specification for Masonry Cement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.
42. Liu, J.; Wang, K.; Zhang, Q.; Han, F.; Sha, J.; and Liu, J., “Influence of Superplasticizer Dosage on the Viscosity of Cement Paste with Low Water-Binder Ratio,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 149, 2017, pp. 359-366. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.145
43. Mehdipour, I., and Khayat, K. H., “Effect of Particle-Size Distribution and Specific Surface Area of Different Binder Systems on Packing Density and Flow Characteristics of Cement Paste,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 78, 2017, pp. 120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.01.005
44. ASTM C187-16, “Standard Test Method for Amount of Water Required for Normal Consistency of Hydraulic Cement Paste,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.
45. ASTM C266-18, “Standard Test Method for Time of Setting of Hydraulic-Cement Paste by Gillmore Needles,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.
46. ASTM C231/C231M-17a, “Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
47. ASTM C1506-17, “Standard Test Method for Water Retention of Hydraulic Cement-Based Mortars and Plasters,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
48. Assaad, J.; Harb, J.; and Maalouf, Y., “Effect of Vane Vonfiguration on Yield Stress Measurements of Cement Pastes,” Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, V. 230, 2016, pp. 31-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.01.002
49. BS EN 196-1, “Methods of Testing Cement. Determination of Strength,” Comite Europeen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium, 2016.
50. BS EN 1542, “Products and Systems for the Protection and Repair of Concrete Structures. Test Methods. Measurement of Bond Strength by Pull-Off,” Comite Europeen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium, 1999.
51. ASTM C1585-13, “Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013.
52. ASTM C157/C157M-17, “Standard Test Method for Length Change of Hardened Hydraulic-Cement Mortar and Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
53. Assaad, J.; Asseily, S.; and Harb, J., “Use of Cement Grinding Aids to Optimize Clinker Factor,” Advances in Cement Research, V. 22, No. 1, 2010, pp. 29-36. doi: 10.1680/adcr.2008.22.1.29
54. Li, L. G., and Kwan, A. K. H., “Adding Limestone Fines as Cementitious Paste Replacement to Improve Tensile Strength, Stiffness and Durability of Concrete,” Cement and Concrete Composites, V. 60, 2015, pp. 17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.02.006
55. Khayat, K.; Trimbak, P.; Assaad, J.; and Jolicoeur, C., “Analysis of Variations in Electrical Conductivity to Assess stability of Cement-Based Materials,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 100, No. 4, July-Aug. 2003, pp. 302-310. doi: 10.14359/12668
56. Chamila Gunasekera, C.; Setunge, S.; and Law, D. W., “Creep and Drying Shrinkage of Different Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymers,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 116, No. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 39-49. doi: 10.14359/51706941
57. El Mir, A.; Nehme, S. G.; and Assaad, J. J., “Durability of Self-Consolidating Concrete Containing Natural Waste Perlite Powders,” Heliyon, V. 6, No. 1, 2020, p. e03165 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03165