International Concrete Abstracts Portal

Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcements have been used in versatile forms in recent construction practices to enhance durability performance and, consequently, to attain longevity of concrete structures. The shear strength of FRP-reinforced concrete (FRP-RC) beams holds significant importance in structural design. However, inherent analytical uncertainty exists concerning shear in concrete members due to the distinctive material characteristics of FRP bars compared to conventional steel reinforcements, such as their low axial stiffness and bond properties. This study aims to identify the shear-resistance mechanisms developed under combined actions between concrete and FRP reinforcements. To this end, the dual-potential capacity model (DPCM) was extended to FRP-RC beam members subjected to shear and flexure, and an attempt was also made to derive a simplified method. To validate the proposed approaches, a total of 437 shear test results from RC members incorporating FRP bars were used. Findings indicate that the proposed methods can provide an acceptable level of analytical accuracy. In addition, a significant shift in the shear failure mode of FRP-RC members with no stirrups was observed from the compression zone to the cracked tension zone as the FRP reinforcement ratios increased. Conversely, when FRP stirrups were added, the shear failure mode was mostly dominated by the compression zone.

This paper presents the behavior of unreinforced cylindrical concrete elements confined with a hybrid system, consisting of an ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) jacket and basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) grids. For exploring the feasibility of the proposed strengthening scheme, a series of tests are conducted to evaluate material properties and to obtain results related to interfacial bond, load-bearing capacity, axial responses, and failure modes. To understand the function of the individual components, a total of 57 cylinders are loaded under augmented confining conditions, including plain cores with ordinary concrete (CONT), plain cores with UHPC jackets (Type A), and plain cores with UHPC jackets plus BFRP grids (Type B). By preloading the cores at up to 60% of the control capacity (60%fc′) before applying the confinement system, the repercussions of inherent damage that can take place in vertical members on site are simulated. The compressive strength of UHPC rapidly develops within 7 days, whereas its splitting strength noticeably ascends after 14 days. The adhesion between the ordinary concrete and UHPC increases over time. While the Type B specimens outperform their Type A counterparts in terms of axial capacity by more than 18%, reliance on the BFRP grids is reduced with the growth of UHPC’s strength and adhesion because of the interaction between the hardened UHPC and the core concrete. The adverse effects of the preloading are noteworthy for both types, especially when exceeding a level of 30%fc′. The BFRP grid-wrapping alleviates the occurrence of a catastrophic collapse in the jacketed cylinders, resulting from a combination of the axial distress and lateral expansion of the core. Analytical models explain the load-carrying mechanism of the strengthened concrete, including confinement pressure and BFRP stress. Through parametric investigations, the significance of the constituents is clarified, and design recommendations are suggested.

The first edition of ACI CODE-440.11 was published in September 2022, where some code provisions were either based on limited research or only analytically developed. Therefore, some code provisions, notably shear and development length in footings, are difficult to implement. This study, through a design example, aims at a better understanding of the implications of code provisions in ACI CODE-440.11-22 and compares them with ones in CSA S806-12, thereby highlighting a need for reconsiderations. An example of the footing originally designed with steel reinforcement was taken from the ACI Reinforced Concrete Design Handbook and redesigned with GFRP reinforcement as per ACI CODE- 440.11-22 and CSA S806-12. A footing designed as per ACI CODE- 440.11-22 requires a thicker concrete cross section to satisfy shear requirements; however, when designed as per CSA S806-12, the required thickness becomes closer to that of the steel-reinforced concrete (RC) footing. The development length required for a glass fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete (GFRP-RC) cross section designed as per ACI CODE-440.11-22 was 13% and 92% greater than that designed as per CSA S806-12 and ACI 318-19, respectively. Also, the reinforcement area required to meet detailing requirements is 170% higher than that for steel-RC cross section. Based on the outcomes of this study, there appears to be a need for reconsideration of some code provisions in ACI CODE-440.11-22 to make GFRP reinforcement a viable option for RC members.

The present study demonstrates the feasibility of using longitudinal hybrid reinforcement in concrete columns in seismic zones. In this research, four concrete columns were constructed and subjected to quasi-static cyclic loading, featuring a combination of steel and glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) longitudinal reinforcement. Two reference columns were fabricated and reinforced in the longitudinal direction with steel bars. These columns had a 400 × 400 mm (15.8 × 15.8 in.) cross-section and 1850 mm (72.8 in.) overall height. All the columns were reinforced with GFRP crossties and spirals in the horizontal direction. The variable parameters were the transverse reinforcement spacing, axial load ratio, and column configuration. The outcomes of this research clearly showed that reinforced concrete (RC) columns that are properly designed and detailed longitudinally with hybrid reinforcement (GFRP/steel) could achieve the drift limitation in building codes with no strength degradation. Further, these hybrid-RC columns displayed enhanced energy dissipation capacity, superior ductility, and improved post-earthquake recoverability compared to columns reinforced longitudinally with steel. The promising results of this study represent a step towards the use of longitudinal hybrid reinforcement in lateral-resisting systems.

This study investigated the serviceability behavior and strength of polypropylene-fiber (PF) reinforced self-consolidating concrete (PFSCC) beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. Five full-scale concrete beams measuring 3100 mm long × 200 mm wide × 300 mm deep (122.1 × 7.9 × 11.8 in.) were fabricated and tested up to failure under four-point bending cyclic loading. Test parameters included the longitudinal reinforcement ratio (0.78, 1.18, and 1.66%) and polypropylene fiber (PF) volume (0, 0.5, and 0.75% by concrete volume). The effect of these parameters on serviceability behavior and strength of the test specimens is analyzed and discussed herein. All the beams were evaluated for cracking behavior, deflection, crack width, strength, failure mode, stiffness degradation, and deformability factor. The test results revealed that increasing the reinforcement ratio and PF fiber volume enhanced the serviceability and flexural performance of the beams by effectively restraining crack widths, reducing deflections at the service and ultimate limit states, and decreasing residual deformation. The stiffness exhibited a fast-to-slow degradation trend until failure for all beams, at which point the beams with a higher reinforcement ratio and fiber volume evidenced higher residual stiffness. The cracking moment, flexural capacities, and crack width of the tested beams were predicted according to the North American codes and design guidelines and compared with the experimental ones. Lastly, the deformability for all beams was quantified with the J-factor approach according to CSA S6-19. Moreover, the tested beams demonstrated adequate deformability as per the calculated deformability factors.