International Concrete Abstracts Portal

This paper presents the prediction of bond strength between ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) and fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcing bars using an artificial neuronal network (ANN) approach. A large amount of datasets, consisting of 183 test specimens, are collected from literature and an ANN model is trained and validated. The ANN model includes six variable inputs (bar diameter, concrete cover, embedment length, fiber content, concrete strength, and rebar strength) and one output parameter (bond strength). The model performs better than other models excerpted from existing design guidelines and previously published papers. Follow-up studies are expected to examine the individual effects of the predefined input parameters on the bond strength of UHPC interfaced with FRP rebars.

The movement of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) toward wide scale acceptance within the concrete industry has generated interest in developing improved test methods to provide quality assurance for this material. Most test methods currently used to measure the tensile behavior of ultra-high-performance concrete require specialized testing equipment that is not typically owned by precast or ready-mix production facilities. These test methods provide reliable data for quality assurance of newly developed concrete mixes, but they are impractical as quality-control tests, which would need to be performed for every UHPC placement. This paper presents the development of a simple and inexpensive test to measure tensile strength and ductility for UHPC and serve as a quality-control test. This method was developed from the double-punch test, commonly referred to as the “Barcelona test,” but has been revised to incorporate substantial changes to the loading and data collection requirements to eliminate the need for expensive, specialized equipment. It was determined that the modified test method could produce reliable results using a load-controlled testing procedure with manually recorded data points taken every 0.635 mm (0.025 inches) of vertical displacement for ductile concrete specimens. It was also determined that specimen surface grinding, loading rate, and punch alignment did not significantly influence the test results. However, the fabrication of the specimens, specifically the rate and method at which the molds were filled, had a significant effect on the results. Accordingly, any recommended standardized test method based off of this procedure should have requirements on specimen fabrication.

Mehdi Khorasani, Giovanni Muciaccia, and Davood Mostofinejad Synopsis: The externally bonded reinforcement on grooves (EBROG) technique has been recently shown to outperform its rival techniques of surface preparation (such as externally bonded reinforcement, EBR) employed to delay the undesirably premature debonding of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) from the concrete substrate in retrofitted structure. However, the behavior of EBROG method under fatigue loading has not been assessed yet, and the present study is the first attempt to achieve the above aim. For this purpose, an experimental program is conducted in which 16 CFRP-to-concrete bonded joints on the concrete slab prepared through the EBROG and EBR techniques are subjected to the single lap-shear test and fatigue cyclic loading. Furthermore, the bond behavior of CFRP strips-to-concrete substrate is investigated in this research in terms of the load capacity, slip, debonding mechanism, and fatigue life. The results showed that the grooving method improved the bond properties of CFRP-to-concrete joints under fatigue loading. By using this alternative technique, the number of cycles until failure (fatigue life) increases incredibly under the same fatigue cycle loading and the service life of strengthened members could be improved under fatigue loading. Furthermore, the effects of different loading levels on the behavior of CFRP-concrete joints installed by EBROG method are evaluated. The results showed that fatigue life of strengthened specimens decreases by increasing fatigue upper load limit. Finally, a new predictive equation was developed based on plotting the maximum applied fatigue load versus fatigue life curves for CFRP-to-concrete bonded joints for the EBROG method.

Due to a dynamic development of infrastructure, engineers around the world are looking for new materials and structural solutions, which could be more durable, cheaper in the life cycle management, and built quickly. One of prospective solutions for building small-span bridges can be precast lightweight concrete reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars. Thanks to prefabrication, it is possible to shorten the construction time. Using lightweight concrete affects structure weight as well as transportation costs. GFRP rebars can make the structure more durable and also cheaper in terms of life cycle management costs. The paper focuses on the fatigue performance of a real-scale arch (10.0 m (33 ft) long, 1.0 m (3.3 ft) wide, and 2.4 m (7.9 ft) high) made of lightweight concrete and GFRP rebars (LWC/GFRP) in comparison with an arch made of normal weight concrete and typical steel reinforcement (NWC/steel). The fatigue loads ranging from 12 to 120 kN (2.7 to 27 kip) were applied in a sinusoidal variable manner with a frequency of 1.5 Hz. This research revealed that the NWC/steel arch exhibited significantly better fatigue resistance when compared to the LWC/GFRP arch. Differences in the behavior of the NWC/steel and LWC/GFRP models under fatigue load were visible from the beginning of the research. The LWC/GFRP model was exposed to fatigue loads, resulting in gradual deterioration at an early stage. This degradation was evident through stiffness being progressively reduced, leading to increased displacements and strains as the number of load cycles increased. The model did not withstand the fatigue load and was destroyed after approximately 390 thousand load cycles, in contrast to the NWC/steel model, which withstood all 2 million load cycles without significant damages or the stiffness being decreased. However, the prefabricated lightweight concrete arches with composite reinforcement seem to be an interesting alternative of load-bearing elements in infrastructure construction.

Serviceability checks in Reinforced Concrete (RC) elements involves the verification of crack width mainly aimed to limit the exposure of the steel reinforcement to corrosion and chemical attack and, thus, improve durability. Classical approaches for assessing the crack width in RC elements provide the calculation of two terms: 1) the average crack spacing, and 2) the average difference between the strain in the steel reinforcement and in the concrete in tension referred to the average crack spacing. A similar approach can be assumed valid also for RC elements strengthened with externally bonded Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) materials, taking into account the additional tension stiffening effect provided by the external reinforcement.

This paper presents the comparisons of some existing code formulations for predicting crack spacing and crack width in RC elements with the experimental results of a database collected by the Authors and concerning tests on RC beams and ties externally bonded with different types and configurations of FRP materials. The paper is mainly aimed to check the reliability of the existing equations provided by codes in order to address the future assessment of reliable design provisions for cracking verifications in RC elements strengthened with FRP materials. The comparisons have evidenced, indeed, some useful issues for the design provisions: 1) larger scatter in the predictions of crack width than in crack spacing and, in particular, for ties, 2) limited effect of shrinkage on crack width, 3) necessity of taking into account the external reinforcement in crack spacing formulations, 4) good reliability of mechanical models for calculating cracks width.