International Concrete Abstracts Portal

The 16th International Symposium on Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-16) was organized by ACI Committee 440 (Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement) and held on March 23 and 24, 2024, at the ACI Spring 2024 Convention in New Orleans, LA. FRPRCS-16 gathers researchers, practitioners, owners, and manufacturers from the United States and abroad, involved in the use of FRPs as reinforcement for concrete and masonry structures, both for new construction and for strengthening and rehabilitation of existing structures. FRPRCS is the longest running conference series on the application of FRP in civil construction, commencing in Vancouver, BC, in 1993. FRPRCS has been one of the two official conference series of the International Institute for FRP in Construction (IIFC) since 2018 (the other is the CICE series). These conference series rotate between Europe, Asia, and the Americas, with alternating years between CICE and FRPRCS. The ACI convention has previously cosponsored the FRPRCS symposium in Anaheim (2017), Tampa (2011), Kansas City (2005), and Baltimore (1999). This Special Publication contains a total of 52 peer-reviewed technical manuscripts from 20 different countries from around the world. Papers are organized in the following topics: (1) FRP Bond and Anchorage in Concrete Structures; (2) Strengthening of Concrete Structures using FRP Systems; (3) FRP Materials, Properties, Tests and Standards; (4) Emerging FRP Systems and Successful Project Applications; (5) FRP-Reinforced Concrete Structures; (6) Advances in FRP Applications in Masonry Structures; (7) Seismic Resistance of FRP-Reinforced/Strengthened Concrete Structures; (8) Behavior of Prestressed Concrete Structures; (9) FRP Use in column Applications; (10) Effect of Extreme Events on FRP-Reinforced/Strengthened Structures; (11) Durability of FRP Systems; and (12) Advanced Analysis of FRP Reinforced Concrete Structures. The breadth and depth of the knowledge presented in these papers is clear evidence of the maturity of the field of composite materials in civil infrastructure. The ACI Committee 440 is witness to this evolution, with its first published ACI CODE-440.11, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Bars,” published in 2022. A second code document on fiber reinforced polymer for repair and rehabilitation of concrete is under development. The publication of the sixteenth volume in the symposium series could not have occurred without the support and dedication of many individuals. The editors would like to recognize the authors who diligently submitted their original papers; the reviewers, many of them members of ACI Committee 440, who provided critical review and direction to improve these papers; ACI editorial staff who guided the publication process; and the support of the American Concrete Institute (ACI) and the International Institute for FRP in Construction (IIFC) during the many months of preparation for the Symposium.

Concrete beam-column joints are critical elements in the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) structures. The use of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement in these joints has gained attention due to its superior mechanical properties and corrosion resistance. This paper presents a comprehensive study of the seismic performance of CFRP-reinforced concrete beam-column joints, focusing on the development of a suitable formula for estimating the seismic shear capacity. Utilizing a finite element analysis (FEA) that was both developed and validated using pre-existing test data, a comprehensive parametric study was undertaken to explore the impact of several factors. These factors encompassed axial load, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, and transverse reinforcement ratio, and their effects on the seismic performance of CFRP-RC joints were thoroughly investigated. Eventually, a suitable formula was proposed for estimating the seismic shear capacity of CFRP-RC joints. Research results will lead in a better understanding of the seismic behavior of CFRP-reinforced concrete beam-column joints, which will consequently guide the design and analysis of CFRP-reinforced concrete structures for enhanced seismic performance.

The seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) structures relies on their ability to dissipate earthquake-induced energy through hysteric behavior. Ductility, energy dissipation, and viscous damping are commonly used as performance indicators for steel-RC seismic force-resisting systems (SFRSs). However, while several previous studies have proposed energy-based indices to assess energy dissipation and damping of steel-RC SFRSs, there is a lack of research on fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-RC structures. This study examines the applicability of the existing energy dissipation and damping models developed for steel-RC columns to glass FRP (GFRP)-RC ones, where the relationships between energy indices and equivalent viscous damping versus displacement ductility were analyzed for GFRP-RC circular columns from the literature. In addition, prediction models were derived to estimate energy dissipation, viscous damping, and stiffness degradation of such types of columns. It was concluded that similar lower limit values for energy-based ductility parameters of steel-RC columns can be applied to GFRP-RC circular columns, whereas the minimum value and analytical models for the equivalent viscous damping ratio developed for steel-RC columns are not applicable. The derived models for energy indices, viscous damping, and stiffness degradation had an R2 factor of up to 0.99, 0.7, and 0.83, respectively. These findings contribute to the development of seismic design provisions for GFRP-RC structures, addressing the limitations in current codes and standards.

Fiber reinforced polymers (FRP) are commonly used to seismically retrofit concrete structural walls. Limited design guidance for the seismic application of FRP strengthening is currently available to designers in guidelines such as ACI PRC-440.2-17 or standards like ASCE/SEI 41-17. This paper presents the description and results of an experimental effort to investigate the effectiveness of FRP retrofitted concrete walls. The specimen wall thickness was either 6 in or 12 in, which represents a typical range of wall thickness seen in older buildings. To better reflect the most common applications seen in the industry, the walls were retrofitted with FRP, and anchored with fiber anchors only on one side of the wall. The study demonstrates that the effectiveness of FRP is reduced as the wall thickness increases and that the FRP must be anchored to the wall for any tangible benefit. The results are used to assess the current provisions in ACI PRC-440.2-17 and ASCE/SEI 41-17. It is apparent that additional testing is required to better understand the complexities involved in the FRP strengthening of shear walls and such testing is scheduled for the near future.

Fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete (FRP-RC) structures have won researchers’ attention for decades as a considerable substitute due to their superb mechanical and non-mechanical properties. Despite the promising potential of concrete structures with glass FRP and basalt FRP that were shown by previous research, there are few specifications for the seismic design of FRP-RC structures to date due to limited research data on their seismic behavior. This paper focuses on the seismic performance of concrete columns with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement by finite element modeling. The effect of longitudinal reinforcement type and ratio, stirrup spacing, concrete strength and axial load ratio are included in the parametric analysis in VecTor2. Properly designed CFRP-RC columns with good confinement generally reach high load-carrying capacity and deformation level, while high axial load could induce relatively severe damage. To verify these conclusions, seven full-scale columns are under construction and will be tested under combined lateral reversed cyclic loading and constant axial loading.