Email Address is required Invalid Email Address
In today’s market, it is imperative to be knowledgeable and have an edge over the competition. ACI members have it…they are engaged, informed, and stay up to date by taking advantage of benefits that ACI membership provides them.
Read more about membership
Learn More
Become an ACI Member
Founded in 1904 and headquartered in Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA, the American Concrete Institute is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development, dissemination, and adoption of its consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
Staff Directory
ACI World Headquarters 38800 Country Club Dr. Farmington Hills, MI 48331-3439 USA Phone: 1.248.848.3800 Fax: 1.248.848.3701
ACI Middle East Regional Office Second Floor, Office #207 The Offices 2 Building, One Central Dubai World Trade Center Complex Dubai, UAE Phone: +971.4.516.3208 & 3209
ACI Resource Center Southern California Midwest Mid Atlantic
Feedback via Email Phone: 1.248.848.3800
ACI Global Home Middle East Region Portal Western Europe Region Portal
Home > News > News Detail
12/1/2007
Share this article on Social Media
Global warming is an all too apparent fact of life-one that is no longer up for scientific debate. Largely the result of the rising world population, the generation of increasing quantities of greenhouse gases (CO2 being the most prominent) leaves the world facing the bleak possibility of continually rising temperatures and other major climate changes that will affect every human on this planet. Slowing population growth will slow the rate of increase in CO2 production, but there is far more that can be done to mitigate the negative effects on the climate. A key weapon in our arsenal for reducing global warming is sustainable development in construction. The goal is to minimize the impact of the built environment through a reduction in CO2 production and energy use-including building with renewable, recycled, and waste materials. The idea is to share the planet and its resources, not just with those alive today, but with those who will follow. In the U.S., the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) and the Green Building Initiative (GBI) have been leading the way to develop guidelines for construction that minimize our CO2 "footprint." In addition to emissions, energy use, and materials, the guidelines also address land use, water use, and indoor air quality. Based on the criteria in the guidelines, buildings can be certified under the USGBC Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and GBI Green Globes programs. For example, using fly ash or blast furnace slag as partial cement replacements can contribute to earning credits for a project because they are waste materials, as can the use of renewable resources, such as timber, and recycled materials, including reused structural steel and concrete. Today, sustainable development is often driven by local politics (requiring green practices or certification) and economic incentives, such as tax credits and construction subsidies. The political and economic facts were brought home to members of the concrete industry last March at the Concrete Summit on Sustainable Development, held in Washington, DC, and sponsored by ACI's Strategic Development Council (SDC). The summit has been followed by two other SDC workshops, one in September and one in November, in San Diego and then St. Louis, with the specific goal of developing a roadmap for the concrete industry to actively pursue sustainable development. I am pleased to report that the roadmap is coming together quite nicely. Some other industries are far ahead of the concrete industry in developing criteria for sustainable development, but the results of some of their efforts provide an excellent example of errors that the concrete industry should work hard to avoid. For example, a building (not concrete) that had achieved platinum (top rank) LEED certification is undergoing significant deterioration less than 2 years after it was constructed. The problem: selecting and using materials in a manner not appropriate for the building's environment. The key lesson is that sustainability means more than using renewable, recycled, or waste materials-it also means choosing materials and construction procedures to produce structures that will remain serviceable for the full design life with minimum requirements for maintenance. And because of the political and economic considerations, it means that the criteria used by groups such as USGBC and GBI need to recognize practices that are known to achieve this goal. Fly ash provides a good example. When fly ash is used as a cement replacement, concrete must be cured longer than concrete made with 100% portland cement to achieve the same strength and freeze-thaw resistance. Thus, fly ash may not be a good choice in construction requiring a short curing period, or even the same curing period as used for concrete made without fly ash. Taking the example a step further, increasing the curing period for structures made with any combination of cementitious materials by even a week has the potential to add years to service life through decreased permeability and reduced cracking. Under current rating system criteria, the use of fly ash is recognized, but adequate or increased curing is not. Clearly, we have work to do. As the world population, expected to grow by 75 million this year alone, approaches 6-3/4 billion people, it would be wise for all of us to minimize our individual impact, as well as the impact of our industry on global climate change. To succeed, we must pursue sustainable development using all of the knowledge available and by recognizing and making wise choices in both the selection and application of concrete materials. David DarwinAmerican Concrete Institutedaved@ku.edu Back to Past-Presidents' Memo List
Global warming is an all too apparent fact of life-one that is no longer up for scientific debate. Largely the result of the rising world population, the generation of increasing quantities of greenhouse gases (CO2 being the most prominent) leaves the world facing the bleak possibility of continually rising temperatures and other major climate changes that will affect every human on this planet. Slowing population growth will slow the rate of increase in CO2 production, but there is far more that can be done to mitigate the negative effects on the climate.
A key weapon in our arsenal for reducing global warming is sustainable development in construction. The goal is to minimize the impact of the built environment through a reduction in CO2 production and energy use-including building with renewable, recycled, and waste materials. The idea is to share the planet and its resources, not just with those alive today, but with those who will follow.
In the U.S., the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) and the Green Building Initiative (GBI) have been leading the way to develop guidelines for construction that minimize our CO2 "footprint." In addition to emissions, energy use, and materials, the guidelines also address land use, water use, and indoor air quality. Based on the criteria in the guidelines, buildings can be certified under the USGBC Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and GBI Green Globes programs. For example, using fly ash or blast furnace slag as partial cement replacements can contribute to earning credits for a project because they are waste materials, as can the use of renewable resources, such as timber, and recycled materials, including reused structural steel and concrete.
Today, sustainable development is often driven by local politics (requiring green practices or certification) and economic incentives, such as tax credits and construction subsidies. The political and economic facts were brought home to members of the concrete industry last March at the Concrete Summit on Sustainable Development, held in Washington, DC, and sponsored by ACI's Strategic Development Council (SDC). The summit has been followed by two other SDC workshops, one in September and one in November, in San Diego and then St. Louis, with the specific goal of developing a roadmap for the concrete industry to actively pursue sustainable development. I am pleased to report that the roadmap is coming together quite nicely.
Some other industries are far ahead of the concrete industry in developing criteria for sustainable development, but the results of some of their efforts provide an excellent example of errors that the concrete industry should work hard to avoid. For example, a building (not concrete) that had achieved platinum (top rank) LEED certification is undergoing significant deterioration less than 2 years after it was constructed. The problem: selecting and using materials in a manner not appropriate for the building's environment.
The key lesson is that sustainability means more than using renewable, recycled, or waste materials-it also means choosing materials and construction procedures to produce structures that will remain serviceable for the full design life with minimum requirements for maintenance. And because of the political and economic considerations, it means that the criteria used by groups such as USGBC and GBI need to recognize practices that are known to achieve this goal.
Fly ash provides a good example. When fly ash is used as a cement replacement, concrete must be cured longer than concrete made with 100% portland cement to achieve the same strength and freeze-thaw resistance. Thus, fly ash may not be a good choice in construction requiring a short curing period, or even the same curing period as used for concrete made without fly ash. Taking the example a step further, increasing the curing period for structures made with any combination of cementitious materials by even a week has the potential to add years to service life through decreased permeability and reduced cracking. Under current rating system criteria, the use of fly ash is recognized, but adequate or increased curing is not. Clearly, we have work to do.
As the world population, expected to grow by 75 million this year alone, approaches 6-3/4 billion people, it would be wise for all of us to minimize our individual impact, as well as the impact of our industry on global climate change. To succeed, we must pursue sustainable development using all of the knowledge available and by recognizing and making wise choices in both the selection and application of concrete materials.
David DarwinAmerican Concrete Institutedaved@ku.edu
Back to Past-Presidents' Memo List
ACI University is a global, online learning resource, providing on-demand access to a wide range of topics on concrete materials, design, and construction
LEARN MORE »
These Awards will celebrate innovation and inspire excellence throughout the global concrete design and construction community.
The American Concrete Institute's newest Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary is now available in print and digital formats. Learn more about the 2019 edition, plus supplemental resources from ACI.
Visit the ACI 318 Portal Now »