Sponsors: Sponsored by ACI 370 Committee Editors: Eric Jacques and Mi G. Chorzepa This Symposium Volume reports on the latest developments in the field of high strain rate mechanics and behavior of concrete subject to impact loads. This effort supports the mission of ACI Committee 370 “Blast and Impact Load Effects” to develop and disseminate information on the design of concrete structures subjected to impact, as well as blast and other short-duration dynamic loads. Concrete structures can potentially be exposed to accidental and malicious impact loads during their lifetimes, including those caused by ballistic projectiles, vehicular collision, impact of debris set in motion after an explosion, falling objects during construction and floating objects during tsunamis and storm surges. Assessing the performance of concrete structures to implement cost-effective and structurally-efficient protective measures against these extreme impacting loads necessitates a fundamental understanding of the high strain rate behavior of the constituent materials and of the characteristics of the local response modes activated during the event. This volume presents fourteen papers which provide the reader with deep insight into the state-of-the-art experimental research and cutting-edge computational approaches for concrete materials and structures subject to impact loading. Invited contributions were received from international experts from Australia, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Germany, South Korea, Switzerland, and the United States. The technical papers cover a range of cementitious materials, including high strength and ultra-high strength materials, reactive powder concrete, fiber-reinforced concrete, and externally bonded cementitious layers and other coatings. The papers were to be presented during two technical sessions scheduled for the ACI Spring 2020 Convention in Rosemont, Illinois, but the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic disrupted those plans. The editors thank the authors for their outstanding efforts to showcase their most current research work with the concrete community, and for their assistance, cooperation, and valuable contributions throughout the entire publication process. The editors also thank the members of ACI Committee 370, the reviewers, and the ACI staff for their generous support and encouragement throughout the preparation of this volume.

Impact resistance of concrete panels has been researched since the 19th century. Studies therein primarily focused on conventionally reinforced concrete and steel fiber-reinforced concrete. Little research on the impact resistance of prestressed concrete exists. This paper investigated the impact resistance of prestressed concrete panels subject to hard and soft/hollow projectiles and under an assortment of prestressing levels. Damage mode, velocity change, impact force, and internal energy were measured and analyzed. A total of twelve finite element analyses, which considered high strain rate effects, were performed, as well as preliminary analyses with different mesh sizes. It is observed that level of prestressing tends to improve perforation resistance of concrete panels. Additionally, large deformation at soft projectiles occurred during impact, consuming the greater internal energy of the projectiles, unlike hard projectiles. As a result, soft projectiles caused a smaller degree of local failure on the concrete panels than hard projectiles with the same mass and velocity.

Concrete median barriers (CMB) are installed to decrease the overall severity of traffic accidents by producing higher vehicle decelerations. In 2016, an update to the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) saw a 58% increase in impact severity of test level 4 (TL-4) impact conditions when compared to the NCHRP Report 350 testing criteria. This study investigates the use of fiber-reinforced rubberized CMBs in dissipating the impact energy to improve driver safety involved in crashed vehicles. Two full-scale barrier prototypes with shear keys were constructed and tested under impact conditions in a laboratory setting. Compared to the Georgia Department of Transportation specified single-slope barrier, the fiber-reinforced rubberized concrete mixture, a design with 20% replacement of the coarse aggregate by volume with recycled rubber tire chips and a 1.0% steel fiber addition, was evaluated based on its performance in toughness, energy absorption capacity, and its recoverable deformation. It is concluded that the TC20ST1 barrier performed as well as the control barrier at the impact load of 150.0 kips (667.2 kN), with neither barrier experiencing any visible damage.

In the past, the study of low-velocity impact response of steel-concrete composite panels (SC) mainly focused on the overall flexure failure mode. To study the impact dynamic response of SC panels under the local punching failure mode, a drop hammer impact test of ten SC panels was carried out in this paper. The influence of the impact energy, impact momentum, and axial compression ratio was investigated. With the increase of impact energy, five damage patterns appeared in turn under the local punching failure mode. And the whole response process could be divided into five stages. It was found that the change of impact momentum had little influence on SC panels, but axial compressive preload could improve the stiffness and the impact capacity of SC panels to a certain extent. A finite element (FE) model based on LS-DYNA was then established and it could simulate the test process reasonably well. A mechanical analysis of the dynamic response process was carried out with the numerical model, including a parametric study on the influence of the axial compression ratio.

The inclusion of rubber in concrete mixtures improved the impact resistance but negatively affected the strength and fresh properties of self-consolidating concrete (SCC). The objective of this investigation was to optimize the balance between the improved impact resistance and the reductions in the strength and fresh properties of rubberized SCC mixtures. This investigation evaluated and assessed the type/size and percentage of rubber needed to develop successful SCC mixtures with maximized impact strength and minimized reductions in strength. The studied variables were the type/size of rubber used (crumb rubber (CR) and two sizes of powder rubbers), percentage of rubber (0%, 15%, 25%, 30%, 35%, and 40%), type of concrete (SCC and vibrated concrete), and the use of fibers in the mixture. Because of the fresh properties restrictions of SCC, it was only possible to develop rubberized SCC with up to 25%, 30%, and 35% CR, powder rubber 40/80, and powder rubber 140, respectively. With the absence of fresh properties restrictions of SCC, it was possible to develop vibrated rubberized concrete with up to 40% of any type of rubber. Using higher percentages of rubber in vibrated rubberized concrete dropped the compressive strength to less than 25 MPa (3.63 ksi). The results also indicated that despite the slight improvement in the fresh properties and strength of mixtures with powder rubbers compared to mixtures with CR, mixtures with CR showed significantly higher improvements in the impact resistance.